Saturday, 15 August 2015

What is Blairism?

We've had plenty of vibrant discussion here recently about what it was that Tony Blair stood for, whether David Cameron is a Blairite, and what it means to be an anti-Blairite when all of the likely next Labour leaders are firmly to the left of the party.
We will make education our number one priority
The Labour government introduced "Academy" schools, outside local authority control, and infused with private cash and management skills.  This continued the process of "opting out" introduced under the previous Conservative government.  The Coalition introduced "Free" schools, outside local authority control, and paid for on a bums-on-seats basis.  The government puts up some capital to get the school up and running.  The Coalition proposed to convert all local authority schools to Academies or Free schools, but this was dropped when someone pointed out that not every school would be in a position to run itself.  The present Conservative government is putting up resources to support any school to become an Academy if it wants to; so any school that wishes to "opt out" in the old parlance ought to be able to.

Blairism in education is to release education from rigid structures; allow new schools to be set up and allow bad schools to fail.  Parents ought to be able to choose schools for their kids, introducing a competition element into the sector.  Standards ought to rise.
Higher education 
The improvement and expansion needed cannot be funded out of general taxation. Our proposals for funding have been made to the Dearing Committee, in line with successful policies abroad. 
The costs of student maintenance should be repaid by graduates on an income-related basis, from the career success to which higher education has contributed. The current system is badly administered and payback periods are too short. We will provide efficient administration, with fairness ensured by longer payback periods where required.
This is the process which started with the introduction of loans and fees, largely completed by the Coalition.  Students borrow from the state to pay for their higher education.  If they do well in their careers they pay back the money over several years; if they don't do so well, eventually the debt gets written off.
Economic stability to promote investment
Tough inflation target, mortgage rates as low as possible
Stick for two years within existing spending limit
Five-year pledge: no increase in income tax rates
We will introduce a Budget within two months after the election to begin the task of equipping the British economy and reforming the welfare state to get young people and the long-term unemployed back to work.
Speaks for itself.  Sensible sound economics: stability, keep taxes down, get people off welfare into work.
A reformed and tougher competition law 
Competitiveness abroad must begin with competition at home. Effective competition can bring value and quality to consumers. As an early priority we will reform Britain's competition law. We will adopt a tough 'prohibitive' approach to deter anti-competitive practices and abuses of market power. 
In the utility industries we will promote competition wherever possible. Where competition is not an effective discipline, for example in the water industry which has a poor environmental record and has in most cases been a tax-free zone, we will pursue tough, efficient regulation in the interests of customers, and, in the case of water, in the interests of the environment as well. We recognise the need for open and predictable regulation which is fair both to consumers and to shareholders and at the same time provides incentives for managers to innovate and improve efficiency.
Free markets where possible, sensible regulation where not.  0.7% of GDP on international aid.

The key to "Blairism" to me seems clear: to have a relatively sensible set of policies which nobody can really argue against.  Who isn't in favour of education??  Who doesn't think the water companies are a bit cheeky?  Who could argue in 1997 or 2010 that the university funding system worked nicely for students and the taxpayer?  So you set your stall where it is difficult to attack.  By doing so you make it very hard for the opposition to score many points.  The Tories in 1997 onwards had no idea whether to attack Blair from the Left or the Right.  If they went Right, they were accused of being nasty; to the Left lies incoherence and general oblivion.  Only when Blairism went off the rails and the truth of Brown's economic incompetence became more widely known could Labour be knocked off course.  Both Coalition parties stood on Blairite platforms, and won.  Ed Miliband was reduced to attacking Blairism with idiotic half-baked ideas such as "Predistribution" and populist anti-finance and anti-electricity rhetoric.  

Cameron's team seem to have understood this throughout the last parliament.  When they came up against a genuine backlash, such as over health reforms, they backed down.  Live on, fight another day.  Bring forward similar proposals a bit later.  Win the election, send your enemies mad, then move the debate slightly in the direction you want it to move.  Win the next battle, move on.  Keep winning the war, because if you don't then someone else will capture the flag and move into Number 10.

There is very little in Blair's 1997 manifesto which moderate Conservatives then or now could be upset about. Obviously, those who want public spending to crash to 15% of GDP, or want a return to Fortress Britain (no red salmon here, folks), will never be satisfied.  More importantly, nor will those who want to reopen coal mines and to return to damp cheese and pickle sandwiches on the railways.

16 comments:

dearieme said...

My memory of cheese on the railways in the early sixties was a of a decent cheeseboard served with celery. Jolly good it was. 'Course. them wuz Tory years.

Devil's Kitchen said...

A good analysis, BE.

Parents ought to be able to choose schools for their kids, introducing a competition element into the sector.

This crucial step is the one that has never been introduced properly, of course.

Both Free Schools and Academies have the same entrance criteria as Comprehensives. And parents cannot actually choose which schools their children got to—only a limited application process based on catchment area.

DK

andrew said...

erm,

so while a govt pushes sensible polices that no-one can easily attack it stays popular.

when that stops it gets voted out.

consider my horizons expanded.

Electro-Kevin said...

Blairism comes in lots of enticing liberal ideas - all very good until lubricated with a *liberal* dose of snake oil.

I sussed him out from his first Education Education Education speech when he said the panacea was a computer at every desk. I knew then what cnuts worked in the computer industry, my school mates having gone into pooter 'consultancy' work making shed loads out of thin air (literally 100s of Ks in the '90s) and shagging lots of women based on that title. The Tory 'Evil Eyes' poster campaign was bang on the money at the time and now even the lefties agree.

The Tories have only gone on and embraced this stuff.

Sorry, Blue. I've had too much to drink to respond to your post with the care and thoughtfulness it deserves. I shall do so later, mate.

Have a good Saturday evening !

Electro-Kevin said...

The one school the Blairist Tories won't give us (and parents quite clearly crave) is grammars.

Working class kids good with their brains - grammars

Working class kids good with their hands - techs

Both can make fantastic money in adulthood. If they are all mixed together they end up holding each other back.

Bill Quango MP said...

Its a strange thing that Labour activists think Blairism is some kind of Tory infiltration of their party.
The opposite is the truth.

The Cameron agenda was to move the Tory party from the right onto the centre ground. He succeeded. And has had his electoral rewards for doing so.

So labour activists who claim their party isn't lefty enough, have misunderstood their parties success in bringing the hard right to the centre.
In the same way that Thacher's never-ending success forced labour to ditch the hard left and move left-of-centre and eventually, bang in the middle.

andrew said...


Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.


so Auden met Corbyn?

Electro-Kevin said...

"The Cameron agenda was to move the Tory party from the right onto the centre ground. He succeeded. And has had his electoral rewards for doing so."

What a total misread of the situation.

Do you honestly not remember the Tory scare campaign in the run up to the election - vote Ukip get Miliband/Sturgeon ? The relentless Tory press smear campaign against Ukip ?

People voted Tory whilst holding their noses - the worst of a bad lot.

Electro-Kevin said...

... people were scared of radical leftism, not yearning for centrism.

Sackerson said...

Blair? An ego-trip accompanied by political triangulation, soundbites ("march them to the cashpoint") and gestures (e.g. getting rid of that floating UK sales venue and prop, the Royal Yacht), and bullying of the media (trying to paint John Simpson as pro-Serb when he stayed in Belgrade to report the NATO bombing campaign). I have no polite words for the man.

rwendland said...

DK> Free Schools ... have the same entrance criteria as Comprehensives. And parents cannot actually choose which schools their children go to — only a limited application process based on catchment area.

Though a Free School can define a catchment area not centred on where the school is. At one time the not-so-affluent road upon which Bristol Free School was located was outside the school's catchment area! That's been fixed now, but kids on the nearby Southmead estate are only allowed to apply for 20% of places with a catchment area centred on the school. 80% of places are for a catchment area centred on a point 3.5 km away from the school in wealthy Stoke Bishop!

James Higham said...

Its a strange thing that Labour activists think Blairism is some kind of Tory infiltration of their party. The opposite is the truth.

Yep.

Anonymous said...

"so Auden met Corbyn?"

No, Yeats did (W.B. not Ron)

adham said...



اهم شركات كشف تسربات المياه بالدمام كذلك معرض اهم شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام والخبر والجبيل والخبر والاحساء والقطيف كذكل شركة تنظيف خزانات بجدة وتنظيف بجدة ومكافحة الحشرات بالخبر وكشف تسربات المياه بالجبيل والقطيف والخبر والدمام
شركة تنظيف خزانات بجدة
شركة مكافحة حشرات بالدمام
شركة كشف تسربات المياه بالدمام

adham said...


اهم شركات نقل العفش والاثاث بالدمام والخبر والجبيل اولقطيف والاحساء والرياض وجدة ومكة المدينة المنورة والخرج والطائف وخميس مشيط وبجدة افضل شركة نقل عفش بجدة نعرضها مجموعة الفا لنقل العفش بمكة والخرج والقصيم والطائف وتبوك وخميس مشيط ونجران وجيزان وبريدة والمدينة المنورة وينبع افضل شركات نقل الاثاث بالجبيل والطائف وخميس مشيط وبريدة وعنيزو وابها ونجران المدينة وينبع تبوك والقصيم الخرج حفر الباطن والظهران
شركة نقل عفش بالرياض
شركة نقل عفش بالطائف
شركة نقل عفش بالدمام
شركة نقل عفش بجدة
شركة نقل عفش بمكة
شركة نقل عفش بالمدينة المنورة
شركة نقل عفش بينبع
شركة نقل عفش بالخرج
شركة نقل عفش بالقصيم

adham said...


شركة نقل عفش بخميس مشيط
شركة نقل عفش بتبوك
شركة نقل عفش بابها
شركة نقل عفش ببريدة
شركة نقل عفش بنجران
شركة نقل عفش بحائل
شركة نقل عفش بالظهران
شركة نقل عفش واثاث
شركة نقل عفش