Monday 6 October 2008

Meddling While Rome Burns

Ofgem has laboured for many months on whether rising energy prices represent hanky-panky and today its report is before us. As part of our usual service to readers we have pre-digested the full 4 MB for you all.

On the positive side: lots of goodies for energy data buffs; several sound micro-points on small-scale anomalies that might bear fixing; opportunity taken to bash the Continentals again for not liberalising their markets; and the inevitable conclusion (*portentous drum-roll*) "no evidence of a cartel"

On the negative, and doubtless in an effort to match the
dirigisme of the times, Ofgem has come up with something it calls "unfair price differentials".

And so, in NuLab press-release-speak, it proposes to "ban unfair price differences". (Does Alistair Campbell draft this stuff for them, or must the words 'ban' and 'unfair' appear in all edicts nowadays ?) More soberly, in the main text it suggests that "
differences in charges for different payment types must be cost-reflective", and they may regulate to that effect. The have particularly in mind to help "more than 4 million customers without gas who currently have no access to the most competitive tariffs" (viz, the discounts available for buyers taking both gas and electricity from the same supplier)

To make the obvious points:

- in an industry where all players use the same infrastructure for the same regulated fees, nothing is more likely to result in all suppliers charging
the same, than forcing them to be fully cost-reflective with no 'unfair' differences

- a discount for buying both gas and electricity would
prima facie seem to be an entirely cost-reflective proposition anyway

- free markets have a way of sorting out irrational price-differentials (provided they don't constitute predatory cross-subsidy etc, which is illegal anyway)

In this day and age we should presumably give thanks that they don't propose to re-nationalise the lot. Not much pleasure, however, to be taken from the trend towards micro-meddling. Back to your knitting, Mr Ofgem: check out the EDF takeover of BE for us properly - and do something to keep the lights from going out !


ND

10 comments:

  1. I saw the OFGEM chap peddling his nonsense on BBC this morning.

    He was trying to pass the blame for consumers not switching away from their monopoly suppliers onto energy firms.

    As someone who has worked selling gas and electricity I can safely say the fact of the matter is that these consumers simply do not want to change suppliers.

    It doesn't matter how many times you phone them up, or knock on their door, they just say no.

    What utter twaddle that man was talking when he insinuated that the energy firms are not trying hard enough to switch consumers to 'duel fuel'.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The energy companies give a huge discount to people who are prepared to read their own meters and pay in advance (direct debit) - and I assume they don't do this out of the goodness of their French and German hearts. Perhaps online dual fuel discounts are cost reflective after all...

    As Stephen L says, what is required is more shopping around not less.

    After the torrid time I had with npower, eon seems brilliant!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm a bit confused (actually that's nothing new!) but, I had thought the major impact of this was supposed to be reducing the extra costs that people using pre payment meters have to pay? Bendy Girl

    ReplyDelete
  4. steven - to be honest I think all regulators are heavily under the NuLab cosh right now

    BE - another free market success story ! and yes, I'd be surprised (and maybe Ofgem would be as well ...) if suppliers couldn't give a commercial justification

    Ms Bendy - that's certainly one category they're looking out for, & they've identified a few more (e.g. folk who don't have a gas supply at all)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8:09 pm

    I have launched an appeal for our Brave City Boys - Britains Battling Bankers!! Its on me blog - will I get your support?

    ReplyDelete
  6. O/T but Huw Edwards just did the news at ten in the style of the PM

    "The current financial crisis, which started in America, and spread to Britain...."
    I wonder who wrote that for him?

    thank god the overworked Peston was on, or the largest one day points fall would have been Thatcher's fault

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bill - the Grauniad's Monday supplement ('Media') today was a special on 'How to save the BBC' (lead article by ... yup, your first guess, Polly Toynbee)

    Mutt - several folk seem to have suggestions for some of those Brave Boys ...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nick, between you me and the blogosphere, local regulators have zero confidence in national ones.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous10:23 am

    aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

    做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

    ReplyDelete