I don't see why you are defending the practice . Just because people do something in a market does not make it helpful or right. I work in a market as do we all in one way or another. Its full of cretins and greedy selfish bastards trying to subvert it in all sorts of ways and has to be regulated . This is true of insurance which has very easy entry .How much more true for the rarified atmosphere of City hocus pocus.I know enough of them to know they do not have a clue what they are doing ususally and I think you have to admit there must be changes.
I think CU's point is that the ban on short selling has made no difference because it wasn't the biggest factor in the demise of HBOS or B&B.
The other thing of course is that you can't prevent people from making contracts, so you can't stop people from doing short selling but hiding it within a more complicated trade.
Banning short selling won't have made the slightest difference.
The botched nationalisation of B&B made things worse. (All privatisation are botched).
The House of Rep's coming to their senses will have knocked them even futher back.
Sometimes I think it'd be better if politicians stopped spouting off about things they don't understand and interfering. Actually I think that most of the time.
I don't see why you are defending the practice . Just because people do something in a market does not make it helpful or right.
ReplyDeleteI work in a market as do we all in one way or another. Its full of cretins and greedy selfish bastards trying to subvert it in all sorts of ways and has to be regulated .
This is true of insurance which has very easy entry .How much more true for the rarified atmosphere of City hocus pocus.I know enough of them to know they do not have a clue what they are doing ususally and I think you have to admit there must be changes.
What have we learnt from this ?
I think CU's point is that the ban on short selling has made no difference because it wasn't the biggest factor in the demise of HBOS or B&B.
ReplyDeleteThe other thing of course is that you can't prevent people from making contracts, so you can't stop people from doing short selling but hiding it within a more complicated trade.
Who'd have thought that the markets would be more volatile without the buying pressure of shorts closing out positions in a falling market?
ReplyDeleteWow, it's lucky we have the AWESOME gordo to chair the economy to commanding heights.
you can't prevent people from making contracts
ReplyDeleteOf course you can
I don't feel at all comfortable being long the banking sector at the moment. I'm taking a pumelling!
ReplyDeleteBanning short selling won't have made the slightest difference.
ReplyDeleteThe botched nationalisation of B&B made things worse. (All privatisation are botched).
The House of Rep's coming to their senses will have knocked them even futher back.
Sometimes I think it'd be better if politicians stopped spouting off about things they don't understand and interfering. Actually I think that most of the time.
N, no you can't. You will have cash under the table or brown paper bags before you will have trading stopped.
ReplyDeleteN - BE is right. There is a witch hunt on the wrong target. the Shanghai exchange, without shortsellers, is down 57% this year.
ReplyDeleteThere are real guilty people to find in all of this; it is not all the fault of short selling.
情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,
ReplyDelete免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,