First things first: Jim wins the compo for most correct guesses at Budget content - by a decent margin, too. Well done that man. A (very temporary) job awaits you in Whitehall as official Reeves-whisperer.
The OBR-induced chaos is all very odd. FFS, Reeves leaked half the Budget, in detail, yesterday - the 'final final' leaks, which once would have been anathema to Parliament and MPs' privileges on being first to learn these things, once jealously defended, not least by successive Speakers. Hugh Dalton felt obliged to resign in 1947 for less (though some suggest the skids were under him already, and he was glad of the pretext to go).
Anyhow: obviously in the circs, Reeves / Starmer felt they couldn't do anything other than play to their own back-bench gallery. Feeble politics though it is, I think we all understand. How much time does it buy them? Maybe enough, actually: it might be nicely judged for that specific audience.
On the energy front, the EV levy was inevitable and we may expect it to rise over the years, to replace fuel duty. (Did any EV user ever imagine otherwise?) I'm interested in 'pay per mile' - does this mean they are tracking vehicle movements (like Musk and the Chinese do), or is it a self-declared matter on the income tax form? I would have thought 'pay as metered' would be better - seeing as how smart meters can supposedly detect and discriminate different types of load. But maybe home charging would represent an easy dodge, even with an SM.
I haven't yet seen the trailed shift of 'green levies' from electricity bills onto general taxation: and I believe they've ditched the idea of scrapping VAT on energy. Will update when I find out. Anyhow, it's pretty clear they've completely given up on the £300 bill reductions that were to be achieved via "cheaper renewables". Not before time: Miliband really does have to ditch that crass rhetoric once and for all, and stop making his DESNZ officials parrot it every time they are asked about bills.
UPDATE: here's at least part of the energy thing which, I reckon, needs more detail to make total sense of:
She told the Commons: “The Conservatives’ ECO (energy company obligation) scheme was presented as a plan to tackle fuel poverty. It costs households £1.7 billion a year on their bills and for 97% of families in fuel poverty, the scheme has cost them more than it has saved. It is a failed scheme. “So, I am scrapping that scheme along with taking other legacy costs off bills. And as a result, I can tell you today that, for every family we are keeping our promise to get energy bills down and cut the cost of living with £150 cut from the average household energy bill from April. “Money off bills, and in the pockets of working people. That is my choice ... Not to leave working families to bear the brunt of high prices, like the Tories did. But to get energy costs down now and in the years to come.
So, yeah: no contribution from "cheaper renewables" (- how could there be?) And on a quick calc (£1.7bn across approx 20m households), that's only £85. So the remaining £65 must come from some other levy-tweaking. We need yet another update.
UPDATE 2: yes, it's a direct transfer of subsidies from bills to general taxation: easy when you know how.
Energy costs will be reduced by the ending of the Energy Company Obligation, which is currently funded through bills, and through the government funding 75% of the domestic cost of the legacy Renewables Obligation for three years. This is on top of extending the £150 Warm Home Discount to a further 3 million of the poorest households.
So: 150 + 150 = 300 & they'll say they've delivered the £300 reduction promise - for "the poorest households", that is. BUT, as I keep saying, Mili's manifesto claim was that it would be delivered by cheaper renewables!
UPDATE 3: the EV tax - eVED - is indeed on a self-certify basis. It is assumed that the 'honesty' rate will be 98.5%, based on the 1.5% default rate on VED. Hmm. That surely has to be optimistic: people pretty much expect to have their number-plate checked by ANPR these days, but who imagimes HMRC will check their milometer?
Have at it all in the comments.
ND
No indexing of student loan repayments I believe. I think that means graduates are hit with an extra 9% tax earlier than before, just as they are trying to get themselves established, buy houses and hopefully have kids. In other words, a deliberate disincentive to all the above.
ReplyDeleteAn extra 2% tax on savings and private landlords. Penalising “delayed consumption” and efforts to be on a more secure financial footing.
And as always, yet more goodies for Scotland at England’s expense.
Still, a couple of communities will be pleased that mandatory State support for large families has been restored.
ReplyDeleteLeader of opp made good entertainment in her reply. Like a good bitch fight!!!
ReplyDeleteInitial thoughts - a BNPL budget. Jam today, paid for by tax rises in, er, election year.
ReplyDeleteThose rises are obviously *Subject to Change, and there's no way she's not hoping to reverse them before the election. Best of luck with that.
CH
Have now posted what seems like just the first part of the necessary update to cover the energy bill reductions headline
ReplyDeleteAs for the chaos, those who take the leak, shall also perish by it I guess.
ReplyDeleteIt seems almost appropriate given the amount of trialling and briefing of ideas flung at walls, the pretty much the whole thing got leaked before Little Miss Ogyny stood up.
CH
I had a half-secret hope that she'd announce that ns&i would start issuing Index-Linked Savings Certificates again, and on improved terms. No joy, it would seem.
ReplyDeleteThanks, pure luck and a thick slice of cynicism.
ReplyDeleteRachel laboured mightily and brought forth a mouse, she will be back. The great difficulty is 'growth'. Everyone is looking for growth but new things are very few and far between, we have to make do with better old stuff and better efficiency and not making mistakes.
Looking around I think I see a great many useless people and useless non jobs. Has to be kept up, no one wants too many visibly on the dole. Which makes me puzzle 'what is an economy'.
I wonder what will become of getting rid of juries. Nothing probably, back to useless non jobs.
The jury proposal is astonishing - we need a weekend post on this - though quite 'logical' in the circumstances of a monstrous backlog in the CJS. Delay alone negates justice quite effectively in very many cases. Do we think he deliberately rolled it out under cover of all the Budget nonsense?
ReplyDeleteActually, do we think Lammy has a brain at all? It is an interesting turn of events, how his reputation, riding high 18 months ago, has turned to mud in every quarter - and it is apparently quite legitimate to write him off as a thicko: everyone does.
Have inserted Update 3 on the new EV tax.
ReplyDeleteSo " I'm interested in 'pay per mile' - does this mean they are tracking vehicle movements (like Musk and the Chinese do), or is it a self-declared matter on the income tax form?
DeleteWith Update 3 being the self-certify bit.
They won't do that.
Responsibility for the reporting or information gathering will be pushed onto - drum roll - garages, Halfords, etc. The MOT records the vehicle mileage - and local garages already record it on services, as they will send you reminders.
Fairly straightforward to build a system (notwithstanding the incoming UK.GOV IT fuck-up) such that reporting is from each garage/maintainer, into the DVLA, attributed to the registered keeper and then matched to the record at HMRC. Gives you another couple of entries on the online form.
Self-certification is limited to agreeing (or not) to the numbers presented by HMRC at that point.
I do not understand how people get to the "track vehicle movements via ANPR" bit. I really don't.
For added spend and Capita fuck-up, create a network of sensors at each traffic light, motorway gantry, roundabout, whatever, that pings each vehicle EMS for ID and mileage. Cue huge numbers of EMS hacks.
Actually, riffing off the EMS hack theme;
DeleteFuel duty is apparently 25 billion quid, about 2% of government revenue.
Given we've already been through the whole Huawei/Critical National Infrastructure malarkey, the thought occurs that a bad actor with access to EMS code, might, under certain circumstances, say, shave a bit off the recorded mileage, under 5%.
Giving a "black hole" of around a billion quid, perhaps more.
Potentially interesting bit of economic warfare.
How easy is it in these electronic days to tweak the mileage on an electric car? If it can be done, it will be done.
ReplyDeleteDriving a couple of fairly new Toyotas in NZ, I'm impressed that now the camera at the top of the windscreen reads the speed limit signs, even temporary roadworks ones, and displays the limit by the speedo, red if you're breaking the limit. Works maybe 90% of the time. NZ roads have a lot of roadworks, as torrential rain in hilly country means stuff (sometimes a whole section of road) gets washed away frequently. Also reminds you that the brake fluid needs changing, though how I'm not sure. In a very damp country it'll need doing more often.
"I'm interested in 'pay per mile' - does this mean they are tracking vehicle movements (like Musk and the Chinese do), or is it a self-declared matter on the income tax form?"
ReplyDeleteTis going to be a most interesting one.
"does this mean they are tracking vehicle movements"
DeleteDuring the trial a couple of years ago of some bad people who killed a guy in Anglesey, it was revealed that JLR not only had information on the villains Range Rover travels, but which doors had been opened when - e.g when weapons were unloaded from the boot.
I enjoyed the conflict implicit in offering further subsidies to wealthy people to buy EVs while introducing a tax on using EVs. Maybe they think people buy them largely to leave in their drive, signalling virtue.
ReplyDeleteOdd the mileage story, don't think we are seeing the whole story.
ReplyDeleteThe car makers are not stupid and neither is the EU (some of the time). Seems a fair chance that mileage data can be made available - but the question is who pays and are all manufacturers on board. And do governments want to reveal they do have the ability to get mileage and road use data - cue screaming from the usual.
So play it gentle for a while, play dumb, let there be a bit of cheating - see how the punters do it - then put the squeeze on. Or maybe (probably) I am crediting the politicians with more brains than they have.
We shall see.
In NZ we saw a Tesla Model 3 with an adhesive badge "This is my last Tesla".
ReplyDelete