This is an uncharacteristically small-minded post, if I may respectfully say so, 'Slicker.If you only go to places for which you can get travel insurance, you will not properly have lived.It's good to see HMG doing something worthwhile, for once - i.e. actually looking after its citizens, rather than telling them impertinently how to live. At this moment, sadly, I bet the citizens in question wish they were American - or Israeli.
TP, people may go tothe danger zone if they like. but I don't see why the government should then help them out.It was their free choice to go and surely they knew the risks.Why should their freedom be my responsibility?
These weren't tourists; I suspect they were doing a FO recce or were journalists looking for s story.I've been there and while the scenery is utterly fantastic you wouldn't go for a holiday unless you planned on trouble and were looking for it.
may well be Shot, we'll have to see.
Once the government gets NOT to support you in the "danger zone", it also get to decide where that is. It's rather like the NHS deciding which illnesses are your own fault and then not treating you. State medicine therefore equals nationalising, not so much the services, as your body.The government is there to serve the people, hard as that may be to imagine with the present bunch.
I went to Northern Ireland during the Troubles, in a Brit-reg car and drove through Newry two hours after a bombing. county Antrim was also very pretty at that time of year.
Having worked for a med assistance co as an interpreter [if you have a med emergency abroad and phone the emergency no in your ins policy you think you're calling your ins co but you're not - you're calling people they employ to sort you out medically or repatriate you] I think it's highly unlikely that these tourists got travel insurance, unless they weren't truthful about where they were going and why. That's what all the fuss about travel insurance was about last week, wasn't it? - that policies won't cover you for acts of terrorism, etc., and indeed, why should they? But I agree with tp that a country can't just stand by and do nothing for its nationals in such circumstances and also, if no one went to these places, how would we know what is really going on? Like your other commenter, I think there is more to it, though.
Well CU lots of perfectly innocent British Muslims were playing beach volley ball and taking snaps in Iraq and Afghanistan. Usually having taken another innocent holdiday in Pakistan, en route.I am shocked at the brazen assumtion they were there to shoot at British troops . Shocked , I tell you
TP, but in the NHS's case they will treat you (at the moment!) for whatever your illness. This is different, you decide to go somewhere very dangerous (there is a war on over the border between Eritrea and Ethiopia)and then the Government steps in to save you.I just don't see the logic. I do not want the state responsible for me the worldover; just as I do not want to be responsible to the state.There are only a few places on earth where there are real border dsiputes that would end in situatiosn like this. If you choose danger, then danger it should be for you.I see your point, I think we have different philosophies about the role of the state.WC- thanks, yes insurance terms is an issue here, hence my mention of it.N - I know, we should resuce and repatriate those caught up in such places when they were on innocent 'training' courses. The sooner we get them home the better, eh?
Tom should have been a war correspondent. Part of me years for that kind of excitement, but at the end of the day, I could never deliberately put myself in danger, I have to consider the impact of leaving my family without a mother should the worst happen.
This reminds me of the Swedish girl who I met on the kibbutz I was staying at in the late 1970's. She explained that her government didn't want Swedes to go to a war zone and there would be no assistance if trouble befell her.
aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片, 做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,
情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友, 免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,
Post a Comment