First, the utterly unspeakable Hesgeth, who should by rights be languishing in a gaol somewhere for his outrageous breach of security in running that insecure and actually compromised Signal chat last summer. There he is, mouthing off in ways scarcely befitting an unrestrained junior under-boss of a New York crime family, just before the capo decided he's heard enough ill-judged, unseemly braggadocio. (The Mafia idiom comes readily to mind in so many of Team Trump's doings.) And the empty boasting about the "effectively unlimited" magazine depth of US forces - it's clearly untrue, and who thinks it's clever? Xi will be at risk of splitting his sides.
Then, there's Starmer's performance when announcing that Trump may use UK bases "for strictly defensive strikes". Just look at the body language, from a man who, like a real political pro, can normally hold it together quite well when he's delivering absolute, calculating lies. His voice was shaky; he looked ill with worry; he wouldn't take questions. A shockingly unconvincing performance, in logic and delivery.
The sequence of events for this hollow man is obvious:
- Lose by-election due to Moslem vote going Green
- Half a dozen Cabinet ministers see their futures dwindling
- Hasty strategy meeting (i): must start heavy-duty pandering to 'the community'
- Trump off on another rogue mission of Netanyahu's devising, wants to rope in the UK: no! Channel Harold Wilson / Vietnam! Make it clear we're on the side of (peaceful) Moslems!
- Trump lets it be known bigly that this is the Wrong Answer: reminds Starmer the RAF is already heavily engaged in the region; and that he'll do whatever he pleases anyway; but that "disloyal optics" are not permitted
- Hasty strategy meeting (ii): "jolly helpful" that an itty bitty Shahed has landed somewhere in the Akrotiri region, and that RAF is been providing top-cover for Jordan (& Turkey?) anyway. Defensive defensive defensive! New statement. Grip podium. Square circle. Pander to both sides - & try to be convincing. Come on man, you can do it!
Then, hasty strategy meeting (iii). Ramp up on those other pandering-plans. Where are we with the new Blasphemy law? Hurry that up. And are we doing enough "blend and extend" to ensure the Grooming Gangs inquiry focuses on London, and child abuse in general? We need to do more: get Khan on the phone again, and those Anti Social Media campaigners.Gah. It's so transparent. But, I tell you - he intends to tough it all out.
ND
