Friday, 31 August 2007

Friday Chat; Is the UK a Democracy?

I see at Iain's much speculation that Broon will go for an October election. This would seem to hamstring the Tories in the middle of a policy review, get the Lib Dims whilst they still have a poor leader, exploit the Broon bounce and allow an election to replace a referendum on Europe.

All in all, it would be a very clever tactic by the Labour party, much as the money to sponsor it would put them in hock to the Unions for ever.

My take though; this is not very democratic or fair is it?

Manchester United don't say we will only play Arsenal on rainy Monday nights when their fans cant' get to Old Trafford, do they?

Having this system mean we are open to abuse by the ruling party, which probably explains why we rarely change government and only do so when things are a disaster. I think Broon knows that soon the economy will be in trouble and the sooner he goes the better he does.

This is not democracy, with the will of the people being paramount. It is the scheming of those in power to keep it, always having the upper hand over the opposition.

I think fixed term limits are seriously needed to rebalance the system. (Along with a federal republic and a fully elected second house, but these are for another day).

Discuss.

22 comments:

Nick Drew said...

Fair & democratic ?? Not, I think, a high priority with McBroon ... gentlemen vs players again, CU !

Sticking strictly to squalid and unprincipled electoral arithmetic: he may feel he has the jump on the Tories and LibDems - but what about the ScotNats ?

Old BE said...

The "will of the people" is certainly not reflected in our system, not even close. We have only had populist governments about twice since the war (Atlee and Thatch) in my humble opinion.

I don't think shorter term limits are the answer, I think a more radical settlement is needed. A directly elected leader (president or PM whatever you want to call it) and Parliament to hold him/her to account. Then a quarter of Parliament elected each year so each seat lasts four years but an annual test of public opinion.

Steven_L said...

I'd prefer the US system of 2 terms only.

I actually quite fancy q whip around to get George W over here when our Yankee cousins are finsihed with him.

We could get him to talk to us about the 'axis of evil'. 'the terrorists and their sympathisers' and their 'ideology of darkness' etc. We could get him to wind up UK liberal-lefties for us.

Mark Wadsworth said...

Fixed terms, elected second house, totally agreed.

Pls explain "federal republic" what's wrong with having a King or Queen? And how do you mean "federal" does that mean E, S NI and W will be treated equally? If so, good.

Old BE said...

Mark, I think CU is referring to a system with a directly elected leader, separate from parliament. If that is what he's talking about then where would the Crown fit in?

Old BE said...

SL he winds up the lefties anyway! Perhaps we could just encourage him to come and live in London after he's done Stateside. Not sure I would want him in charge of the UK, London would suit me though.

S said...

Funnily enough whenever a new party gets in government they never seem quite so keen on changing the perk the incumbent government gets on when to call an election.

Mountjoy said...

I agree it is definitely not democratic, but then Brown is the man who :

1. stopped a Leadership election for the Labour Party, so he did not have the inconvenience of a vote;

2. wouldn't make Harriet Harman, elected as his Deputy Leader, the Deputy PM due to Brown's spite. Nice way to treat a lady;

3. made sure there was no leadership election for the Scottish Labour Party; and

4. may yet be kamikaze enough to announce a 'snap poll' on Tuesday, then watch as his opinion poll "lead" evaporates due to regional variations, differential turnout etc, and he loses scores of Labour MPs; allows the Tories to virtually wipe the Lib Dems out; and probably faces a hung parliament or such like.

That's what Brown gets for his disregard of democracy, and his party's inability to deliver on policy it promised in its manifestoes in '97, '01 and '05 :-)

CityUnslicker said...

I am a staunch Republican and would pack the Queen and her ilk off to Canada or wherever wants them.

We will never have an aspirational and democratic society as long as we have this relic of feudalism at the top of the Government.

We could then have a president with very limited powers, a strong house of commons which was set purely on population numbers and a directly elected 2nd chamber.

The 2nd chamber could then have a large federal element to it, in the sense of various regions and nations of the UK all getting equal amounts of seats.

In addition Scotland and Wals should be able to send their (well, some of) assembly members and Scottish parliament members directly to the second chamber.

Sackerson said...

Sorry, CU, but I am the very opposite of a staunch Republican. We did have a very good arrangement - the Crown in Parliament, the Bill of Rights and all that. What we have seen is the capture of power by democratic means, and the subsequent subversion of democracy, by a small political elite that is far more absolutist than the English monarchy. Remember that it was the Scottish style of kingship, with belief in divine and autocratic right, that sparked the Civil War, and the fear of its return led to the Glorious Revolution.

Our weakness was that we thought Parilamentary custom and tradition would restrain our PMs as effectively as our monarchs. But a Republic? Imagine Tony Blair as President-for-life. Napoleon, Stalin and Mao ended by making themselves emperors, with or without the title.

The first thing we need to do is restore the primacy of our Parliament. It is folly to think that destroying what you have will make something better appear in its place. The very last thing we need is Bakunin.

I blame the media - they assiduously promote sentimental, fuzzy-headed groupthink. I've just been listening to Giddins and Steve Bell talking highfalutin' bollocks on Any Questions, so I can understand how people these days can be misled by what they think are intellectuals. They'd be torn to shreds in a college tutorial.

Anonymous said...

I agree with fixed terms. Elections should only be called early due to a political crisis, not because it suits the governing party.

Wolfie said...

"I am a staunch Republican and would pack the Queen and her ilk off to Canada or wherever wants them."

Careful what you wish for, you may yet live to see your nightmare.

CityUnslicker said...

Sackerson - I see the president of many countries as an inspirational figure.

What you don't addres by keeping the status quo is the fixed system of class in our country. No one can be Queen or King except those born to it. Many titles are the same. The French had the right idea in the revolution.

I don't mean to sweep away all our constituion by any means; but recent Governments have dangeroulsy unbalanced our governmental system to such an extent that I don't think we live in a democracy anymore.

CityUnslicker said...

Wolfie - Let's hope so. Freeing us of feudal bondage is no nightmare.

Welshcakes Limoncello said...

I'm with you on fixed terms: it is ridiculous that a PM can just call an election when it suits him / her. Also with you on the Lords.

Anonymous said...

"We have only had populist governments about twice since the war (Atlee and Thatch) in my humble opinion."

Yes, it is interesting that we are always presented with a fait accompli - the choice between a supposed "star" and a washout. One might think we would get the difficult choice between two outstanding individuals carefully chosen by their parties, the media unable to decide which to plump for and with voting being extremely close. In reality there is either apathy leading to no change or a total landslide. So in the end there is no democracy.

Maybe we should ask Putin to become PM, before the deranged child molesting psychopath decides to blow old Blighty to bits on an off day.

Anonymous said...

I'm not bothered at all about the Queen - at least I know where she is, what she gets up to and where she got her money from.

I'm not sure I can say the same about Philip Green and Abromovich.

Sackerson said...

CU: ... and now the French don't have a class system??!!

Dr Johnson said that if you put two men in one room for 15 minutes, by the end of that time one would have established his superiority over the other. The best we can hope for is to restrain the most powerful, which the 1688 settlement achieved, until the invention and abuse of media power and information technology.

Don't fall for Maoist distractions - after the monarchy, they'd need another victim, and another. What democracy have we ever had? No-one I ever voted for became my MP; the only vote that matters is with your personal property, at least you are still allowed to keep a little of that and decide how to use it or invest it. As for the rest, the less power the government has, the better, and after that it doesn't matter whether it's a government of the Left or Right - but it's the Left that really wants to crank up its power.

Anonymous said...

More than thirty years ago, Quentin Hogg (remember him?) gave a stunning (Dimbleby?) lecture which he called "The Elective Dictatorship", and in which he made many of these points.

I particularly remember him saying "at the centre of the web sits the Prime Minister", as a prelude to focussing on the timing of dissolutions as being a major anti-democratic issue.

Plus ca change...

Anonymous said...

No we are not a democracy, nor are we supposed to be. We are a constitutional monarchy.

The Monarch disolves parliament and issues warrants for an election.

She doesn't have to listen to ministerial advice and she has the army and police (who swear loyalty to the crown, not the government) to back her up.

Anonymous said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

Anonymous said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,