The 3-hour period of utter, and highly uncharacteristic radio silence, after the Guardian story broke[1] and before the barefaced denial was issued yesterday evening, must have been a great time to have a bug planted in the (Chinese) coffee machine in No.10.
They must have been lining up Olly Robbins as the fall-guy - and negotiating his deal. That's not just some middle-management scapegoat, that's Very Big Indeed. A serious human sacrifice to appease the gods of Starmerdoom. Wonder what's in his "early retirement package"?
And - will it be enough?
Interesting to see, in retrospect, just how craftily the earlier Starmer statement was drafted[2]. Did lawyer Starmer - who must, surely, have been told how crucial it was to stick precisely to the script - not know why it was worded the way it was? Is that what we're to believe? Well, flat denial is his only option; so flat denial it must be.
And it's being reported he know about this on Tuesday. 48 hours is a very long time not to come clean: time enough for the leaker (see below) to get to the Guardian, and for the Graun itself to go through the very significant editorial operation that would be needed before dropping something like this. The whole thing explains why No.10 was already said to be planning to prorogue Parliament early this session - no more PMQs this side of May. And "it's understood Lammy didn't find out until Thursday" - hahah! He's obviously (a) completely out of the loop; and (b) as disloyal as all Hell. (OK, I suppose we all guessed that anyway.)
My immediate thought is: how does this play for La Romeo?[3] Is it the making of her, because [perhaps] she wasn't involved when Fondlebum was set on - but now knows exactly where those bodies are buried? You can just hear her opening words in that panicky all-hands meeting:
"Now listen: before we can figure a way out of this, you all need to tell me exactly what happened. All of it. Everything!"
ND
______________________
[1] Hats off to the Guardian, BTW: they've put themselves into the nuclear fallout zone. Their source must be truly excellent - and still out there, hoho.
[2] “The vetting process was undertaken by UK Security Vetting on behalf of the FCDO and concluded with DV clearance being granted by the FCDO.”
[3] I say this because she may well be the last person standing after this is finished. Even then, she's not in the clear: evidently there's that heavy-duty Deep Throat operator somewhere in Whitehall, for the Guardian to get this leak: and she has a shedload of enemies ... [BTL on that link]

8 comments:
I presume that odious creature Mr Robbins has been promised a peerage for this. Mrs May gave him a knighthood for his role in her Brexit betrayal and with this lot failure to serve us, their paymasters, always seems to be rewarded. And Mr Robbins will no doubt join his fellow comrade in the upper house. Birds of a feather, I think.
I have often said that people are not given titles for doing good things for people, but given them for doing bad things to people. The evidence seems to support my contention.
Curiouser and curiouser. So what put the mockers on Mandlebum? Something substantive or some box ticking gone wrong?
Hard to imagine there is much about Mandelson that is not already known. I doubt he has been blabbing to Putin, anyway Mandy is gone so all that remains are opportunities to embarrass Starmer - very handy coming up to May.
The Wiki article on UK Security Vetting has an interesting two paras under Criticism. One about Mandelson and Epstein and the second from Arthur Snell who tells us the system is a bit (a lot) crap.
The puzzle in my mind is why Mandelson in the first place. Sure he is an untrustworthy slimy chap that might fit in well with a certain kind of Ambassadorial role. I would not have given him a job cleaning the bogs. So what hold did Mandelson have over Starmer, why give him such a high profile job? Surely the FO could find someone less odious and less of a liability.
Anyway, if the security services were on the ball they would have known the Epstein connection so a bit of a mystery why Mandelson was not black balled much earlier. Maybe Q was asleep on the job.
Just maybe this was Starmer's idea of a cunning plan, tempt Mandelson into a trap - politically speaking. The other side of the coin is why did Starmer not ignore Mandelson for the Ambassador job and let him sink out of sight. Was there some reason Starmer could not ignore Mandelson.
Are you implying that Mr, ahem, Einstein might have passed to Mandelbum some information about Starmer that might cast the aforesaid PM in a bad light? Shurely shome mishtake.
Or maybe Mandelbum had his own sources about Starmer's indiscretions. Maybe they moved in some of the same circles. Who knows?
@ Maybe they moved in some of the same circles
Fnar fnar
PM this evening said that the Indie had the story about failing vetting months ago and no one seemed to notice at the time. Also said the fail wasn't Epstein but China related. The Indie journalist who broke the story seemed highly doubtful that TTK could have been unaware of it
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/mandelson-epstein-starmer-us-ambassador-trump-b2824777.html
The comments echo concerns within the party after a string of embarrassing sackings. Sir Keir last week lost deputy prime minister Angela Rayner for failing to pay £40,000 of stamp duty while she was housing secretary.
Homelessness minister Rushanara Ali lost her job after she made her tenants homeless, while anti-corruption minister Tulip Siddiq quit after she was investigated for corruption through her family’s now-ended autocratic regime in Bangladesh. And former transport secretary, Louise Haigh, resigned over revelations she was prosecuted and found guilty of falsely claiming a mobile phone was stolen from her.
Post a Comment