OK then, customs union it ain't! (see below). At the start of this whole ridiculous story I suggested that sometimes, just sometimes, the frontal assault pressed home with relentless determination can perhaps be appropriate. But only if you have the numbers.
Since November May has attempted, and seems still to be attempting, a war of attrition - without the numbers. Nothing could better illustrate her strategic blindness, her complete and utter lack of imagination. And here we are, with a 'snap GE' apparently being mulled.
Surely there's no super-majority for that?? (Do the DUP wish to treat with Corbyn? Does any Tory MP reckon their chances in a May-fronted election? How many Labour MPs would do anything to stop Corbyn being gifted the opportunity?)
That Cabinet room will be fairly foetid at the end of 5 hours. How many of them will stick it out to the end? Will she still have a Chancellor? Will physical punches be thrown, actual wrists be slashed?
Can we hope someone is secretly recording it for posterity? Iannucci, we thought you were exaggerating.
ND
Showing posts with label DUP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DUP. Show all posts
Tuesday, 2 April 2019
Wednesday, 20 February 2019
The Swirling Realignment of British Politics
The 'Independent Group' - a small splinter of plywood, or the first jolt of tectonic shift? The Brexit Party (Co Ltd) - a single-issue vanity project, or the model for parties of the 2020's? The 'UK Youth Climate Coalition' - an NGO ramp, or a nascent force for change? The only thing we may be sure of is that none of these new developments will go short of cash: that's the easy bit.
Yes, as we all knew, 2019 is going to be a year for the political connoisseur. Which politician, and/or which organisation, will be both sharp and flexible enough to make anything from these swirling pieces of jigsaw? Can bricks be made from the straws-in-the-wind? Let's look at the existing organisations, all of which look leaden-footed right now, but all of which have resources and incentives to attempt to capitalise on the chaos.
1. Celtic Fringe parties (primarily SNP, DUP, Sinn Fein). All essentially single-issue and opportunistic. Probably don't need to change in order to survive in their current state, even if that's a rather passive objective. SNP will need to weather the Salmond storm (and hence will tend to wind their necks in a bit more than they otherwise would); but it's not clear that Labour are in any position to roll them back out of Westminster at the next GE. One comes across suggestions of a 'unilateral inde-referendum', which couldn't be ruled out. Mostly, though, with the Salmond of Damocles over their heads, it'll be watch-and-wait.**
For many months I have puzzled over Sinn Fein's quiescence; and it's nearly two years since I last got a proper political briefing in a Dublin pub. My inclination is to assume that, as an organisation with a clear goal and the ability to play a long game, they are just waiting for the chance to pluck the juicy prize when the bough bends sufficiently for them to reach up and take it. (To this end, BTW, they must surely be willing ultimately to take up those Westminster seats that everyone assumes they'll forswear forever.)
2. Libs. Is it too glib to pass on without further comment? In a world where genuine political novelty is in the air, they don't look like any sort of major beneficiary, even if someone might someday casually enquire as to the price of their rather small block-vote. (We all know that answer: PR.)
3. Greens. Must rather like the look of the 'UK Youth Climate Coalition', in much the same way as a bunch of OAPs like the look of kids playing mixed-sex touch rugby in the park. Everyone hopes to harness da yoof (particularly if they know how to set up a good website) but only Momentum shows any signs of weaponising it so far (see below).
4. Labour. Do any C@W readers have an insider's insight here? My secondhand info is that the split within Labour between Corbyn-worshippers and the rest runs bitter and deep to a degree only lefties really understand. Still, we must assume the Official Labour Party will keep it together enough to take the field at the next GE. We must also assume that, buoyed by the (relative) success of the student-loan bribe in 2017, they will be offering free unicorns to every child; and, most specifcally, a voting age of 16 - perhaps arguing to 18-19-20's that they'll get much more of what they want if they vote for reinforcements from even younger teens next time. (Monbiot shows here how they'll easily dress this up.)
And, as noted before, Momentum (that's Momentum Co Ltd, actually and technically another middle-age corporate vehicle) have already gone a way down this youth road, with moderate success. The key here is whether Disillusioned-with-Jeremy of Bedsit, England can keep the faith for another two whole years. Maybe. Maybe not.
Anyhow, the near term future for Labour looks to me like More Of The Same. Making no headway in Scotland. Worried about northern Brexit towns. Quite deeply exhausted by internal warfare - too much so to mount any kind of genuine revival or metamorphosis. (The summer of antisemitism really did take a toll, as far as I can tell.) Corbyn, and particularly McDonnell, starting to look their age, whilst still kidding themselves they can play a waiting game.** Starmer the only vestige of manifest leadership (or maybe Watson?), even if Cooper is keeping plenty of powder dry. Which brings us to ...
5. The Wicked Tories. I suppose we must reckon that the next few days might bring about a few desertions... [OVERTAKEN BY EVENTS] And it's hard to overlook the sheer number of C@W BTL comments that read "I'll never vote for those bastards ever again, ever". And perhaps the new Farage vanity-vehicle is really attractive enough to adopt the mantle over the next two years. (Though if that's the plan, they might have come up with a better party name.)
That said: the Tories are UK history's great survivors. Loyalty, inertia, lassitude; as you will. But it's not called Conservative for nothing (and has there every been a bogeyman quite like Corbyn?) Of course, it also speaks to More of The Same too, even more resoundingly than with Labour. There can't be an accommodation with Farage, at least until after the next GE. No mighty leaders-in-waiting have set up camp within the party, even if a romantic sort of Boris-camp has subsisted for years and we can all see the other petty displays of unlimited ambition in little side-booths all across Westminster.
So - there are some jigsaw pieces to push mournfully around the table. How many more substantive elements will complete the picture at the time of the next GE?
ND
____________________
** Sinn Fein might have some excuse for watch-and-wait; but in the case of both the SNP and Labour, I reckon they are kidding themselves as to the effectiveness of their would-be opportunism. They all dream of being Wellington at Salamanca; but in reality it's more like idleness and inability to make the political weather.
Yes, as we all knew, 2019 is going to be a year for the political connoisseur. Which politician, and/or which organisation, will be both sharp and flexible enough to make anything from these swirling pieces of jigsaw? Can bricks be made from the straws-in-the-wind? Let's look at the existing organisations, all of which look leaden-footed right now, but all of which have resources and incentives to attempt to capitalise on the chaos.
1. Celtic Fringe parties (primarily SNP, DUP, Sinn Fein). All essentially single-issue and opportunistic. Probably don't need to change in order to survive in their current state, even if that's a rather passive objective. SNP will need to weather the Salmond storm (and hence will tend to wind their necks in a bit more than they otherwise would); but it's not clear that Labour are in any position to roll them back out of Westminster at the next GE. One comes across suggestions of a 'unilateral inde-referendum', which couldn't be ruled out. Mostly, though, with the Salmond of Damocles over their heads, it'll be watch-and-wait.**
For many months I have puzzled over Sinn Fein's quiescence; and it's nearly two years since I last got a proper political briefing in a Dublin pub. My inclination is to assume that, as an organisation with a clear goal and the ability to play a long game, they are just waiting for the chance to pluck the juicy prize when the bough bends sufficiently for them to reach up and take it. (To this end, BTW, they must surely be willing ultimately to take up those Westminster seats that everyone assumes they'll forswear forever.)
2. Libs. Is it too glib to pass on without further comment? In a world where genuine political novelty is in the air, they don't look like any sort of major beneficiary, even if someone might someday casually enquire as to the price of their rather small block-vote. (We all know that answer: PR.)
3. Greens. Must rather like the look of the 'UK Youth Climate Coalition', in much the same way as a bunch of OAPs like the look of kids playing mixed-sex touch rugby in the park. Everyone hopes to harness da yoof (particularly if they know how to set up a good website) but only Momentum shows any signs of weaponising it so far (see below).
4. Labour. Do any C@W readers have an insider's insight here? My secondhand info is that the split within Labour between Corbyn-worshippers and the rest runs bitter and deep to a degree only lefties really understand. Still, we must assume the Official Labour Party will keep it together enough to take the field at the next GE. We must also assume that, buoyed by the (relative) success of the student-loan bribe in 2017, they will be offering free unicorns to every child; and, most specifcally, a voting age of 16 - perhaps arguing to 18-19-20's that they'll get much more of what they want if they vote for reinforcements from even younger teens next time. (Monbiot shows here how they'll easily dress this up.)
And, as noted before, Momentum (that's Momentum Co Ltd, actually and technically another middle-age corporate vehicle) have already gone a way down this youth road, with moderate success. The key here is whether Disillusioned-with-Jeremy of Bedsit, England can keep the faith for another two whole years. Maybe. Maybe not.
Anyhow, the near term future for Labour looks to me like More Of The Same. Making no headway in Scotland. Worried about northern Brexit towns. Quite deeply exhausted by internal warfare - too much so to mount any kind of genuine revival or metamorphosis. (The summer of antisemitism really did take a toll, as far as I can tell.) Corbyn, and particularly McDonnell, starting to look their age, whilst still kidding themselves they can play a waiting game.** Starmer the only vestige of manifest leadership (or maybe Watson?), even if Cooper is keeping plenty of powder dry. Which brings us to ...
5. The Wicked Tories. I suppose we must reckon that the next few days might bring about a few desertions... [OVERTAKEN BY EVENTS] And it's hard to overlook the sheer number of C@W BTL comments that read "I'll never vote for those bastards ever again, ever". And perhaps the new Farage vanity-vehicle is really attractive enough to adopt the mantle over the next two years. (Though if that's the plan, they might have come up with a better party name.)
That said: the Tories are UK history's great survivors. Loyalty, inertia, lassitude; as you will. But it's not called Conservative for nothing (and has there every been a bogeyman quite like Corbyn?) Of course, it also speaks to More of The Same too, even more resoundingly than with Labour. There can't be an accommodation with Farage, at least until after the next GE. No mighty leaders-in-waiting have set up camp within the party, even if a romantic sort of Boris-camp has subsisted for years and we can all see the other petty displays of unlimited ambition in little side-booths all across Westminster.
So - there are some jigsaw pieces to push mournfully around the table. How many more substantive elements will complete the picture at the time of the next GE?
ND
____________________
** Sinn Fein might have some excuse for watch-and-wait; but in the case of both the SNP and Labour, I reckon they are kidding themselves as to the effectiveness of their would-be opportunism. They all dream of being Wellington at Salamanca; but in reality it's more like idleness and inability to make the political weather.
Friday, 14 December 2018
No Lunch for Labour
Labour's Brexit strategy? ... actually, they haven't got one.At best, it's just a glorified vulture-tactic: circle aimlessly, high above the ground, in the hope that something keels over and dies under your nose.
Reading a range of leftist contributions aroud the www, the only sub-group with a clear slogan are the ones who want R2. But Labour commentators who see just a few tiny problems with R2 - as anything that might benefit Labour specifically, or even as just a genuinely practical proposition - see things in a much more problematic light. Try this, from Little Owen Jones, for example. OJ's pieces of late have become highly structured masterpieces of equivocation. Each time he writes, he has to go through the ritual of praising Corbyn to the skies - his punishment for having dared to doubt the master for just a very few weeks last year - and mapping out just how awkward everything is. But, whisper it softly, he is gradually becoming less sycophantic in substance, his regular and well-argued conclusion being: there might not be much here for us. It's not greatly different from a host of other writers on the left, who are all enjoying the spectacle of the Tory and DUP lions and hyenas scrapping; but are otherwise pretty much reduced to wringing their hands. Oh, it's all so difficult to know what to do.
Yes, the vulture doesn't actually have to do anything as dynamic and skilful as hunting something down and despatching it. You could see why that counsel of idleness suits a perennially work-shy git like Corbyn. Less obviously, even the hard-driving McDonnell is also given to waiting and watching - because he's a marxist, whose belief-system is that it is all going to turn out right on the night, courtesy of the Hand of History. He's sure he'll eventually find something dead on the veldt - the bloated body of capitalism, to be precise - on which the proletariat can gorge.
The lions and hyenas have to do something pretty stupid for this to be the outcome. Some of them have fairly few brain cells, it's true. But they operate in prides and packs, the collective wisdom of which is probably adequate for the task of ensuring no lunch for the vulture.
ND
Tuesday, 20 November 2018
Damn Uppity Proddies
It's no joke.
With much graft and heft, Team May has been slowly trying to get the good ship BINO to port. Despite all the leaks and a frankly underpowered engine, it has been heading for home.
As Nick Drew wrote yesterday, May has a battle plan, a really crap one, but a plan nonetheless. Corbyn's team are now trying to pretend he is pro-EU, a remarkably stupid proposal even by their own low standards. The ERG Tories are split because they must choose between loyalty and rebellion and that is not an easy decision for backbench Tories to make.
However, we have the DUP. The DUP are more of May's kind of enemy. Determined, Pig-headed and perhaps even a bit ignorant. The remain media will point out they don't speak for Norn' Ireland, but they do care. They have never sort to. They speak for themselves and their model is the SNP in Scotland.
What the DUP currently want is the same treatment for NI as the rest of the UK, something Southern Ireland and the EU long ago identified as the insoluble puzzle of Brexit - to their advantage.
Now, rational people might think the DUP would understand a bit of this and decide that, given they want Brexit, a bit of compromise would be a price worth pay.
COMPROMISE however, as we long know, is not something the DUP are given over too - just ask the gays!
Cutting off your nose to spite your face is a heroic action in their slightly warped world, standing firm against everybody is also to be respected - right or wrong does not come into it.
Thus perhaps it will come to pass that Team May is felled not by her own backbenchers but by the DUP -ending the confidence and supply arrangement could cause a General Election which I do think would see Labour as the largest party and the end of even BINO brexit.
With much graft and heft, Team May has been slowly trying to get the good ship BINO to port. Despite all the leaks and a frankly underpowered engine, it has been heading for home.
As Nick Drew wrote yesterday, May has a battle plan, a really crap one, but a plan nonetheless. Corbyn's team are now trying to pretend he is pro-EU, a remarkably stupid proposal even by their own low standards. The ERG Tories are split because they must choose between loyalty and rebellion and that is not an easy decision for backbench Tories to make.
However, we have the DUP. The DUP are more of May's kind of enemy. Determined, Pig-headed and perhaps even a bit ignorant. The remain media will point out they don't speak for Norn' Ireland, but they do care. They have never sort to. They speak for themselves and their model is the SNP in Scotland.
What the DUP currently want is the same treatment for NI as the rest of the UK, something Southern Ireland and the EU long ago identified as the insoluble puzzle of Brexit - to their advantage.
Now, rational people might think the DUP would understand a bit of this and decide that, given they want Brexit, a bit of compromise would be a price worth pay.
COMPROMISE however, as we long know, is not something the DUP are given over too - just ask the gays!
Cutting off your nose to spite your face is a heroic action in their slightly warped world, standing firm against everybody is also to be respected - right or wrong does not come into it.
Thus perhaps it will come to pass that Team May is felled not by her own backbenchers but by the DUP -ending the confidence and supply arrangement could cause a General Election which I do think would see Labour as the largest party and the end of even BINO brexit.
Monday, 26 June 2017
DUP agree simple deal for Government
So, time to reflect on the DUP-Tory negotiations.
Much harder this time round than 2010 when Clegg and Cameron were clearly such bossom buddies (with hindsight, easily could have swapped roles with one another, so close were they politically).
This time the DUP sensed their chance against a weakened Prime Minister and came up with a very long list of demands, for a party that is not strictly needed to keep the Government in power.
This then drew 2 weeks of avid criticism of May (remember, I was not a fan originally and have sadly seen my view of her come to pass) and her inability to negotiate even this.
The first rule of negotiation though, is to negotiate, to stay at the table. Not to strop off like a child or say 'no deal' like the yanks do all the time. This achieves little. What actually works is patiently sitting there, hearing the otherside out, whilst making it clear you can't give them much but still want a deal.
This takes time, in this case 2 weeks, eventually if your position is sound and a deal makes sense for both parties, then it is done on reasonable terms. Even when one side started out with a hard bargaining position.
So to today, where the DUP have won basically a tiny pork barrel and concession of some policies the Tory's did not want to implement anyway (again, good negotiation tactic to offer the easy giveaways up).
So on balance I would give this deal a good 7/10 - the main drawback being the awkward handling a the beginning causing a longer delay than necessary - but the right answer in the end.
It does not bode too badly for Brexit then, not that you will read that in the mainstream media currently.
Much harder this time round than 2010 when Clegg and Cameron were clearly such bossom buddies (with hindsight, easily could have swapped roles with one another, so close were they politically).
This time the DUP sensed their chance against a weakened Prime Minister and came up with a very long list of demands, for a party that is not strictly needed to keep the Government in power.
This then drew 2 weeks of avid criticism of May (remember, I was not a fan originally and have sadly seen my view of her come to pass) and her inability to negotiate even this.
The first rule of negotiation though, is to negotiate, to stay at the table. Not to strop off like a child or say 'no deal' like the yanks do all the time. This achieves little. What actually works is patiently sitting there, hearing the otherside out, whilst making it clear you can't give them much but still want a deal.
This takes time, in this case 2 weeks, eventually if your position is sound and a deal makes sense for both parties, then it is done on reasonable terms. Even when one side started out with a hard bargaining position.
So to today, where the DUP have won basically a tiny pork barrel and concession of some policies the Tory's did not want to implement anyway (again, good negotiation tactic to offer the easy giveaways up).
So on balance I would give this deal a good 7/10 - the main drawback being the awkward handling a the beginning causing a longer delay than necessary - but the right answer in the end.
It does not bode too badly for Brexit then, not that you will read that in the mainstream media currently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)