Thursday, 18 October 2007

BBC Job cuts

With my 'back to the 1970's theme ' hat on I see that the NUJ has been out today threatening BBC management for daring to suggest 1,800 job cuts.

This for everyone not losing their job is good news; firstly many of the jobs will go through natural wastage in any event. Secondly the BBC has been expanding hugely in the last 10 years and there is no reason to continue its growth at this rate.

However we are stuck with the BBC until 2016 thanks to the new licence agreement. This is potentially 3 elections away.

My plan for the BBC would be as follows:

1. Scrap the licence fee. this is a very regressive tax that affects the poor disproportionately. instead fund any public broadcasting out of the government general fund.
2. If the government wants to continue to subsidise the television sector then it should offer tax cuts as an incentive to produce rather than penal charges to consume.
3. To keep a certain amount of public broadcasting on the television the government should take up David Elstein's brilliant idea of auctioning off subsidy to make and show specific programmes.
4. With this in place the BBC could be fully commercialised. I happen to be of the opinion that its output will be better than now with the added vie of privatisation.
5. Funds also withdrawn from Channel 4 as this channel too should not need any good subsidy.

We would have a stronger, more vibrant and more cost efficient television sector overall.

Whenever the BBLefties go on about quality just remember who made The Soprano's, 24 and the West Wing and who makes What not to Wear, Spooks and Holby City?

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

You are being unnecessarily subtle. All that's required is:-
Win election. Sell BBC. Done.

CityUnslicker said...

£3 billion a year would do the inheritance tax cut...mybe your right!

Anonymous said...

Being a former NUJ member, I sympathise with those who stand to lose their jobs. The BBC is so outdated anyway. I friend of mine has just taken early retirement from the BBC and is going for a total career change, learning how to repair clocks. And moving out of London to somewhere green and hilly. I don't think it will be long before the BBC launches its own interactive tv on the internet, where it has to be honest and transparent.

I thought you would be interested in this link, you may already know, the IMF top economist has started a blog:

http://news.iwebtool.com/article_32939.html?mp=1

Mark Wadsworth said...

1, 4 and 5 agreed.
3 I'll defer to you
2 - no way, not ever. A tax break is a subsidy that has to be paid out of other people's taxes. These film people already get a billion or so in bungs!

Altho' Dearime's suggestion has the merit of being even simpler. And simple = good.

Anyway, what are the NUJ going to do? Go on strike? With the number of rival channels and websites around nowadays, who is going to give a stuff, frankly?

Anonymous said...

"Win election. Sell BBC. Done."

would prefer:-

Win election, break BBC up into small, safe pieces, sell pieces.Done

CityUnslicker said...

Ellee - thanks for the link. I am sure those with jobs under threat are unhappy as any of us would be personally.However you can argue at the BBC that many people there are doing jobs that simmply don't need to be done.

there cannot be much job satisfaction in that.

Bill Quango MP said...

Why are the BBC acting like NUT members?
Less money ! well we will have to close schools it's the only solution.

Less money ! well we will have to make less programs and show more repeats.

Do they really need ALL these journalists at the rugby for instance ?

Really, can't BBC 4 just appear on BBC 2 instead ?
Look at BBC 3. Does Little Britain really need it's own channel?

At the very least BBC 4 and 3 can combine to one station saving a fair few pounds.

There are savings to be made that will have little impact on programs, output or quality.

James Higham said...

Number 1 for sure.

CityUnslicker said...

ezzler - welcome and quite right;perhaps there is some political motivation for this type of behaviour though.

Paulie said...

1. Funding the BEEB out of a general fund would make it a state broadcaster. This would suit those who object to the concept of public service broadcasting as it would mean that the BBC could be effectively closed down under EU state-aid rules. It would also defeat the object of PSB in the first place - independent of government, investing to counteract the market failure that has effected every other broadcasting ecology in the English-speaking world (apart from the US, obviously). And 'regressive'? Not as regressive as having your kids watching adverts for three hours a day.


2. The licence fee isn't a government subsidy. There's no reason why the government couldn't offer tax cuts as an incentive as well, though the cultural sector in the UK would probably prefer a well-invested group of PSBs to tax cuts - the BBC is widely seen as the cornerstone of quality content-production in the UK - and it results in more investment in original content in the UK than the rest of the EU combined (that incluudes France by the way).

3. David Elstein has always adopted pretty-well the same position that Murdoch lobbyist have taken on the BBC. His proposal would result in the fragmentation and collapse of PSB in the UK. If you're in favour of that, fair enough. Elstein could do with being a bit more honest about this himself.


4. Quality of content would improve with privatisation? Give me one precedent outside of the US? It was a disaster in Australia, Germany and even in France. And, I'd repeat the point about investment. UK TV viewers register higher levels of satisfaction with the quality of TV than anywhere else in Europe - and programme makers get more investment than the rest of Europe put together. We make quality original TV in this country. That's rare.

And how come the UK doesn't produce content as good as The Sopranos? Well, a highly protected marketplace with six times as many viewers ensures that the US can invest in TV on a scale that even the BEEB can't - about the heaviest risk that British programme-makers can take is a six-part series with one team of writers. In the US, they can afford 24-episode flops written by a team of writers. There's a lot of shit TV that makes the small screen in the US - no-one would be able to risk that here.

Your plans here would result in almost exclusively US-originated drama on British TV within a couple of years - and a total collapse in the production of original TV drama.

I'd think about it again if I were you...

Anonymous said...

WLZGGZ Wonderful blog.

Anonymous said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

Anonymous said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,