Tuesday, 31 December 2024

Guess the (blog) readership: RESULT

Further to the little Xmas blog-quizlet, I can report that the 2024 C@W top five countries-of-readership, as given by google-stats, are as follows, in descending order:

  1. Hong Kong
  2. China
  3. USA
  4. Singapore
  5. UK
For reasons of fairness we'll amalgamate 1 & 2 because I can't imagine anyone reckoned on g-stats distinguishing HK and China: so 2-5 all move up one place and then it becomes relevant to note that #6 (becoming #5) is Norway.   HK+China is #1 by a country mile, BTW - rather gratifying.  And the total viewer-hits for the year was approx 800k, so it's not a particularly small sample (if not remotely premier-league blogging).  As noted before, maybe this is naïve but I don't really feel this is badly bot-distorted because the hits fairly clearly match subject-matter.  If clickbait was the only game in town you can guess what key-words we'd be majoring on.

I gave you a clue which was that the BTL ecosystem isn't at all representative (unless most of you live in HK, I suppose - and I know for sure that's not the case for several of our friends).

We had some pretty left-field suggestions: Belarus, North Korea & Yemen, to be precise.  But there's a clear winner, and it's Caesar H, with China / USA /  UK /  Russia /  Belarus.  Hon mensh to Matt who also got three countries correctly from the top five, but not so accurately ordered.  Russia, BTW, = #6 (revised ranking), reinforcing both the above awards as it featured in both their lists.

ND

2024 Predictions Compo: RESULT

Tradition has it that around now we dust off the crystal balls and gaze into the year ahead.  So: while you're up in the loft looking for your predicting paraphernalia for 2025, let's look at how 2024 worked out against everyone's forecasting.

The questions from last year

  1. UK GE: date (month); 
  2. ... and number of Labour MPs after the GE 
  3. US Presidency: who wins? 
  4. Size of V. Putin's share of the Russian vote (as announced) 
  5. By how much, and in what direction, will the FTSE100 change between midnight UK GE polling day and the end of 2024? 
  6. Length of Sam B-F's gaol term upon sentencing (note: zero is a number). Extra point for size of the fine in USD 
  7. Where will Man Utd rank in the Prem at the end of the '23-4 season, and who will be manager?
Answers:  

  1. 4 July.  We all plumped for the autumn ... save for Mr Cowshed who said "early July"!  Off to a flying start.
  2. 411.  What a fiasco.  Closest here was Caesar H, at 400.
  3. Mostly Trumps here: two Bidens and, errrr, a "Haley"
  4. 88.48%.  Another win for Cowshed, with 92%: see footnote on a curiosity.
  5. As of 10am, it's plus 0.2%. Barring some amazing action this afternoon,  SubOptimal easily wins this one with +0.22%
  6. 25 years / "repay $11bn".  Not sure that's strictly a fine.  Anyhow, several people went with either 20 or 30 years; nobody got close on the $$$.  An entertaining 99 years sentence from the retributive Caesar (thumbs down from him, then); and a lenient 3 from Lilith.
  7. 8th / ten Hag.  The best all-round performance on this one: the majority saw tH surviving - well, at least that long - and clustered tightly around 8th.  An entertaining suggestion of Wayne Rooney from BQ.
Good sport!  But there has to be a winner, and the judges say ... Anomalous Cowshed!  With hon mensh to SubOptimal (who [s]he? - please do come again) and Caesar H.  

Up soon: 2025. 

ND

_____________

Note on Putin's vote:  the initial announcement was 87.3%, on which I had been tipped off a few days earlier & duly reported here.  However, subsequently it seems to have been revised upwards (a few late votes, perhaps - well, it's always hard to vote with a severely twisted arm.  And 87% was pretty demeaning).  A pity, because then I'd have won in this category - my prediction was 83%.  But there's no accounting for rigged votes.

Friday, 27 December 2024

Reality dawns on (some) lefties


In a world of echo-chamber opinion-forming, it's always important to keep up with What The Other Side Thinks.  My go-to for what is sometimes called the 'Movement Left'** is Novara Media, a fairly businesslike collective containing its rag-bag share of humourless, mulish identitarians but also some very intelligent people, occasionally with sufficient of an empirical bent to pay attention when it really becomes obvious they are barking up the wrong tree, doctrine or no doctrine.  The recent US election can have that effect on people.

By way of an end-of-year review, their three leading lights (Bastani, Sarkar & Walker) put out this video which I commend to you.  Note in particular the second main section - "Did 'Woke' Die in 2024?" - starting around 25 minutes in.  It contains some pretty trenchant critique of a lot of stuff their general political tendencies would have strongly inclined them towards fairly unreflectively in the past, as they pretty much admit.  Marks the (grudging) acknowledgement of a lost battle in the culture war, I'd say.

The best critiques of those baleful leftist manifestations often come from the more intelligent & reflective corners of the Left itself.  I can also suggest Brian Leiter and Adolph Reed (both American) for more of the same.  Self-professed Marxists all - but smart with it, and contemptuous of what richly deserves contempt.  (Kathleen Stock ditto, but I'm not sure she's a Marxist.)

ND

UPDATE - here's an infinitely more verbose capitulation from the same stable.  Much less honest (1,000 fancy words on "well, of course I never fell for it"), and much funnier, albeit unintentional.  But boy, some of these lefties can't half go on.  You'll pick up some new words, too - if you can struggle through it. 

______________ 

** Roughly speaking, comfortably elitist middle-class leftists outside of regular party politics, mostly youngish & protest-oriented, generally woke and prone to 'language-/ thought-policing' - and thus also inevitably further left than anything as boring as Labour itself. 

Monday, 23 December 2024

Xmas Quiz: guess the audience!

With the year-end readership figures all but fiinalised and the rankings being very clear-cut, we are in a position to pose a little teaser:  over the course of 2024 ...

... which are the top 5 countries-of-origin of the C@W readership? 

(per blogger-stats provided by google).  Answers in descending order, please.  

If anyone gets this right, I shall suspect it's CU or BQ, both of whom still have admin access, much as we miss them.  I couldn't have guessed myself.  Clue:  forget whatever you imagine to be C-O-O of the BTL commenter population, we ain't representative.

PS: someone might tell me I'm being naïve, but I can't imagine the answer is "actually they are all bots".  If I'm wrong about that, it means (a) that's one helluva lot of bots out there - what are they all doing?  (b) they must keep coming back a remarkable number of times - why would they do that?  (c) they are quite discerning bots because they come in numbers relating to the subject-matter of individual posts, as far as I can judge. 

Answers on New Year's Day.

ND



Sunday, 22 December 2024

Credit where it's due (2)

Simple Stories from everyday life in capitalist civilisation ...  

Nearly two years ago I dished out the 'C@W Probate Awards' - a ranking of organisations in terms of their bureaucratic efficiency, based on one person's experiences.  Here's another personal tale.

A couple of weeks ago I lost my wallet.  Argghh.  Turned out it was probably 'mislaid for me' by a young family member during a game of hide-and-seek, because it turned up in a very odd place around the house.  Well, there ya go, all part of life's rich tapestry.  Anyhow, as a reflex security measure I promptly cancelled all the cards etc & had them reissued.  Here's the resulting ranking.

"No more than what I'd expect" award  -  'Sentinel' card protection scheme.  One call did it all, as regards getting the process started.  And, very promptly, they called back with a status / next-steps-with-helpful-details report from each of the relevant companies.

"Quickest off the mark" award - Amex.  This required a 'phonecall on top of Sentinel's actions, but the replacement card was in my hand and activated in less than 24 hours.  OK, Amex fees are relatively high, but boy, the service reflects it.

"Dealing with complexity" award - Barclays.  This isn't the first time I've praised B for this (see earlier story), though BTL on that post somebody gave us a very different tale.  To be fair, this time around only B really had anything complex to deal with, but anyhow they rose to the occasion.

"Sluggard" award: jointly to Santander and Transport for London (my 'BorisPass').  Each took a full week - and plainly, these things don't need to take that long.  It has to be said, though, that the lady in branch at S was the most pleasant person I've had to deal with in quite a while, and showed initiative, too.  So I'm generously marking it down as "not her fault"!

One final thing:  in the past I had sometimes mused, in the abstract: which would be worse - losing wallet, or mobile 'phone?  Based on this fairly satisfactory experience, I'd say: deffo the 'phone.  I needed it so many times to sort out the wallet thing (making temporary alternative dispositions, 2FA, etc), I have to believe it would be significantly more incapacitating to lose the 'phone.  An important learning experience.

Learning the hard way is always often tough, but hey, that's how we (well, the survivors, anyhow) move forward.  Any other stories that aren't too painful to dredge up?  

ND

Friday, 20 December 2024

Polly Toynbee, True Believer: hope springs eternal?

The public career of Polly Toynbee is a continuous source of mirth.  How many socialist saviours has she hitched her wagon to, only to have her hopes crushed.  Owen, Blair, Brown, Patricia Hewitt (sic), ... and now Starmer/Reeves.  Always bearing the imprint of the last person to sit upon her / brief her confidentially over lunch.  But before the worm turns & the Great Disappointment strikes, whilst her wagon still hitched there's nothing she won't do by way of providing what she thinks of as helpful outrider support.  Here's the latest - in the Graun, as usual: 

The Waspi women suffered outrageous misogyny, but in poverty-stricken Britain they’re not the top priority. The government is right in its decision not to pay the women up to £10.5bn in compensation ... a government [does not] have a financial duty to repair historical sexism.

Polly: calm down!  Starmer & Reeves - just like your former beau Brown - don't mind lying & brazening these things out.  It just doesn't bother them!  They don't need your sophistry.  Haven't you spotted how they are leading you by the nose?  Here was you, Polly, back in July in that self-same Grauniad

Starmer will bin the two-child benefit cap and outdo New Labour on tackling poverty – I’ll bet on it. I will eat my hat – or several – if Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves don’t soon find the money to bury the pernicious two-child benefit cap. In her first budget, expect Reeves to find the funds for this, and other public spending not yet announced... Some worry that Starmer and Reeves will be deterred by the campaign to force them to pay up, fearing it would signal their willingness to capitulate and splurge on everything else. I don’t think they’re that frit, with the markets and everyone that matters backing them. It would demonstrate surefooted self-confidence...

Any doubt about their good intent vanished with their creation of a new child poverty unit. ... Every Labour government always reduces poverty: this one will be no exception.  Expect no less from Starmer and Reeves, and probably more... And they will start by hurling the two-child benefit cap into the dustbin of atrocious Tory policies. 

Heart-rending stuff, eh?   Here's how her infatuation with Brown ended ...

ND

Thursday, 19 December 2024

Labour & local government 'reform'. Hmm

Some years ago I had a long stint (3 terms) as a local councillor.  Local government has changed in various ways since then, but I remain very well tapped-in locally and have plenty of first-hand perspectives.  I like to think I've seen, and indeed participated in, some genuinely useful Local Authority actions over the years. 

Lots of folk reckon that giving local people "more say" in matters makes for better, more informed decision-making, as well as creating an important cadre of people that step up to take responsibility for stuff.  Doing this for the most part in the properly-constituted, formal Local Authority framework is only right to protect all concerned.  But we can also applaud, for example, the many benefits of healthy local media organisations, albeit precious few local newspapers survive that are worthy of the name.

From Burke and his "little platoons", through Simon Jenkins and his localist enthusiasms, to Andy Burnham et al with some decent track record to display, there are many advocates of wholesale transfer of powers to local authorities.  I should stress that I, too, see major benefits of localisation in sectors where / governance arrangements under which, it is shown to work in practice.  These should be carefully identified and reinforced.  But there are just so many examples of utter nonsense in play.  To take just a few:

  • Lutfur Rahman
  • the outrageous goings-on at the Teesside Development Corruption - sorry, Corporation, that would disgrace a banana republic
  • Rebecca Long-Bailey
Ah, LRB - remember her?  In a substantial pre-GE 2019 document (by weight, that is, not genuine substance) she planned to hand the whole of our energy infrastructure, physical and supply, over to local authorities (the irony! when you see what a cock-up they've always made of their energy endeavours), right down to the level of parish councils and even "local communities ... of around 200 homes"; and of course all workers in the sector to be unionised.   200 homes!  That's when you know you're dealing with a doctrinaire head-case.  OK, nobody ever paid it any serious attention at the time; and she languishes, whipless, on the back benches now, having been the "continuity Corbyn" candidate in 2020, thoroughly trounced by Starmer, and reduced to feeble parliamentary protest-votes.  But still, it shows what some people mean by localisation.

There are other worries, too - see this article by the intelligent-for-a-Grauniad-writer Martin Kettle.

The Labour government itself is of course deeply conflicted on all this right now.  More power for LAs - but don't dare stand in the way of our house-building or energy plans, because we ain't gonna let you.  Ah yes, local people know best - until they run into a Thatcher or a Starmer who "really knows best".

What do we all think?

ND 

Sunday, 15 December 2024

Miliband, China, & the feasibility of government plans

Last week Miliband published his risible "Clean Power 2030 Action Plan", piling on yet more nonsense atop the supposedly supportive NESO report of a couple of weeks ago which ostensibly provided cover for his & Starmer's disingenuous retreat from "100% decarbonisation by 2030" to "100% always meant 95%".  That's a lot of reading there, if you're so minded.  Don't expect much[1] intellectual consistency, though.

Anyhow, whatever target he finally declares to be what he really meant all along, one of Mili's ideas is for some kind of 'bonus' to encourage developers to use UK supply chains instead of, as at present, importing just about everything including the workforce.  I can report that would-be new renewables developers are all very keen to be given this bonus, in whatever shape or form it materialises - to the point where they are putting their plans on hold until they learn the details!  Unfortunately, even the fingers-crossed "endorsements" of Mili's breakneck 2030 timetable state that there isn't a nanosecond to be wasted (code for "it's impossible, matey") - so this new cause of delay (among very many one might list) could prove to be a pretext for yet another volte face.  Most likely, I guess, the ditching of the UK Supply Chain thing[2].  By way of support for this cynical view: FID has just been announced on Phase 1 of our very first Carbon Capture & Storage project[3] - and the developers have announced a "non-binding ambition" to source 60% of their stuff from UK supply chains.  How very amusing.

And of course the same goes for the building industry - in spades!  (see what I did there?)  1.5m new houses (sorry - homes: we now learn a significant % will be converted office blocks) cannot remotely be built with nothing but indigenous supply & labour.  Nor the building standards that so many activists believe they were promised would be imposed on housing developers - for energy efficiency / heat pumps / solar panels / disabled access etc etc.  There's another target ripe for downwards revision.

In amongst all this oh-so-cynical realism, we learn that in the New Year ... Mili is off to China!  - that well-known "developing country" (for COP purposes) which is the source of almost all solar panels and much else besides.  What, do we imagine, is the purpose of his mission?  To tell them they must locate their factories in Sunderland, & stop burning coal?  To lecture them on human rights?  To demand the return of Hong Kong?  To stop sending weapons components to Putin?  Do tell us, Ed - what will constitute success for your mission?  We only ask because we want to know.  

ND

___________________

[1] I was about to say "any / whatsoever" there: but in fact there is a thin strand of consistency detectable.  Having not formally decided whether or not to extend the wretched Drax's baleful biomass subsidies beyond 2027, Miliband pays lip-service at least, to the possibility Drax stops generating thereafter.  Personally, I'd be very surprised if he held his nerve against the blatant subsidy-farmers at Drax - but this formal reserving of the position is at least a modest positive sign.  

[2] See, for example, the sad little story of the Vestas Isle of Wight turbine blade production / job losses.  How are those "650,000 good new jobs" shaping up, Ed?

[3] Obviously this announcement of "CCS" at Teesside came with a great fanfare.  Look closer, and you'll notice that its primary sponsors, BP and Equinor, are committing only to the new gas-fired power plant at this stage.  That's the low-hanging fruit, of course, and in any event, CCS or no CCS, is likely to have a role as part of Mili's "fleet of gas-fired back-up" which he now realises he always meant to retain.  We'll believe the commitment to the actual CCS aspects when we see it, Ed ...

Monday, 9 December 2024

What Syria means for Russia

At the peak of its vainglorious Cold War pomp, the USA reckoned to maintain forces sufficient to fight two major wars and one minor war - simultaneously.  Well, it was never put to the test.  But perhaps there's the measure of a true global superpower.  Putin, of course, fancies his Russia as a superpower ...

I wonder how he'd assess his standing the day after Damascus fell.  To describe this as humiliating for him is an understatement: if you can't see it, you obviously don't read much from the teeming world of fiercely patriotic Russian 'milblogs'.  He must own to an intelligence failure on a par with Israel's, pre October 2023; the loss of a client regime in under a fortnight; in material terms, the loss of his logistical springboard to Africa, where he aspires to a buccaneering, influential and lucrative interventionist positioning; and in political terms, the loss of prestige.

Ah, prestige.  Who uses that term these days?  In my earliest soldiering, I found myself briefly under the tuition of a Chief Instructor who'd fought in the closing 12 months of WW2 and in many a campaign through the '50s and 60's.   He told us that everything he'd done, all across the globe, was for the sake of upholding and extending British prestige.  If, today, we are too post-imperial to care about such things well, across most of the world and most definitely including Russia, prestige matters immensely.

Putin and his Russia just aren't up to it.  How much does he look forward to his next meeting with Xi?  With Kim?  With Erdogan?  The man who can't prosecute a mid-sized war in his own back yard, nor prop up a single strategically vital client on whose territory he maintains sizeable naval, army and air assets.  The man who, for all his much vaunted experience of decades and supposed statecraft, even now doesn't realise that the enemy gets a vote?  Even after Ukraine indeed turned out, as predicted, to be Finland rather than Georgia. 

See, Volodya, superpowers need to be cognisant of how, when they extend themselves in foreign lands, it's necessary to do a great deal more than plonk down some forces, kick a little ass, and then assume everything's bought and paid for.  Check out Rome in its prime, Britain, the USA - and note just what an all-enveloping, wrap-around approach needs to be taken to hold what you think you've got.   How many snipers and opportunistic hit-and-runners you need to be prepared for.  What all those other carping, jealous powers can do, with so little effort and just a little hostile intent, to incommode you and your positions on your faraway clients' turf.  How (in the military idiom) if you want to hold the line at a river, you must hold both banks.  Oh, how much all-round capability it all requires!  Capability you just don't have.

If you ask me, this humiliation will result in Putin lashing out, and bodes worse for Ukraine than anything else so far.  Which other cat can he kick?  But even there ... the enemy has a vote.

ND

Wednesday, 4 December 2024

Even the Guardian notices 'Net Zero' is expensive

UPDATE:   Seems Kier 'Re-set' Starmer has resiled from "100% decarbonisation by 2030" already!   Now to be 95%, it seems (see prescient comments BTL)   Amusingly, his relaunch isn't on the Guardian front page yet.  Greg Wallace is, though ...  We'll have another post on this shortly

______________________________________________________      

Something I find depressing is the way so many perfectly well-meaning people have swallowed the deception that renewable energy is cheaper - all the way to "much cheaper" - than fossil fuels.  We needn't summarise the arguments or facts.  But here's a sad, earnest example from a 'community energy' project

A staggering 13% of households in England experience energy poverty ... Rising energy prices and inflation have started to affect people’s life quality, health and well-being ... Fortunately, there is a way to counter energy poverty, reduce energy bills, and keep them low going forward. Renewable energy is the cheapest and cleaner option to produce electricity ... The country is reducing its dependence on volatile fossil fuel markets and creating sustainable solutions for energy security. Renewable energy developments are crucial in ensuring more affordable energy for all.

*Sighs*.  Not much point in having this lady directed to Prof Dieter Helm**, I guess - the fine essay to which one of our anons directed us BTL on the previous post.

Is there hope?  Well, maybe: the Graun seems belatedly to be catching up with reality: 

  • Will Labour’s 2030 green energy goal cost more than 2035? They should come clean ...costs to the consumer shouldn’t be ignored   
  • Starmer has discovered a tricky truth about the electric vehicles transition: there’s no gain without pain ... the move to net zero won’t be cheap or simple 

The first, by the redoubtable Nils Pratley, is quite punchy as far as it goes (& we may suspect he knows well that he could have gone a lot further).  The second (Gaby Hinsliff) is, errr, not really in the Dieter Helm league.  otta start somewhere, I suppose.

ND

_______________

** I have often disagreed with Helm on several issues (sometimes to his face in open debate) but his summary of the issues in the first part of this is masterful 

Sunday, 1 December 2024

Two big social experiments of huge significance

One of the great virtues of the USA is that individual states have a great deal of autonomy over large swathes of policy-making, and can effectively conduct experiments that the rest of us can watch.  Could be viewed as an extension of 'fail fast, fail cheaply' capitalism that confers those systematic advantages that so bewilder socialists and statists all over - because of course when they take an action, it's because they are right - and there'll be no going back or letting empirical failure get in the way of determined execution of the policy. 

If that's the hardened mindset, then the warnings of conservatives like Burke and Johnson against making changes without serious proof of benefit, are doubly appropriate.  What are we to make of the two ultra-significant social experiments about to be kicked off?

Australia's move to ban under-16s from having social meejah accounts is perhaps in the 'US states experimental' category.  A relatively small western country, with representative social concerns, is trying something prima facie of enormous difficulty but with clear social ramifications.  Perhaps it's so implausible they'll succeed as to make it all a bit hypothetical (I don't recall the illegality of underage drinking stopping me buying a pint in a pub at the age of 16**).  What if it has a genuine impact?  FB et al sure as hell don't want to trip up complacently on this one, and have it sweep the rest of the world.  How will they react: ultra-cooperative? dismissive?  faux-cooperative?  Go Australia!, I say: let us know how you get on. 

Here at home we have the looming Assisted Dying Act as the Bill goes into further stages.  What have people made of 'experiments' etc elsewhere?  To hear the Bill's sponsors, they've thought of everything.  But here's an interesting article on the Oregon 'precedent', which shows how what we might call "legal interpretation creep" is an ever-present possibility.  We also know that some proponents of euthanasia have every intention of broadening the scope at the first opportunity.  Why couldn't the Act be for a trial period of, say, 5 years with a sunset clause?

I'm sure there are many wise thoughts out there on both issues (Kev has already contributed on the second), which I hereby solicit BTL.

ND

____________

** I'll bet many of you have the same experience.  The principle in those days was: "Lads gotta learn how to handle their drink & take their turn at bar billiards quietly in the corner".