Tuesday, 5 February 2008

Inflation or Deflation ? The Market Speaks

Do the math ...


Readers of the excellent
Bearwatch (now sadly in some kind of semi-limbo) will have enjoyed the debate over whether the next economic cycle will be inflationary or deflationary. I tend to expect the former, and the unhappy Mitchells & Butlers saga gives us an interesting market data-point that reinforces this view.

Recall that M&B put on a huge 30-year derivative position to provide an inflation hedge for a putative but ultimately illusory property deal. The strike was 3.1775%, the 'hedge' became stranded, and was finally liquidated when £391 million out-of-the-money last week. M&B had
bought the fix, so OTM for them means implied RPI is higher than the strike.

So - do the math, as they say. Principal was £ 240 million and it's an interesting question as to what we assume is the relevant risk-free discount rate: but if we say 5%, doing some simple sums,
the implied 30-year RPI is 3.7% ! (it's fairly robust: +/- 50 basis points on the risk-free rate results in only +/- 5 bps on the implied rate)

And 30 years is a long time ! OK Gordon, that's what it costs to hedge out your stable economy these days - where's your economic miracle now ?


ND

14 comments:

CityUnslicker said...

excellent piece Nick. You have the beating of Worstall in the numbers game.

Steven_L said...

Well you've lost me on this one Nick. What are we talking about, kind of like a spread bet on inflation or something?

Nick Drew said...

It ended up being a bet for M&B, but they hadn't meant it that way.

The plan was to buy a load of commercial property, the income from which they considered likely to rise & fall with inflation. But to raise max + cheapest financing, a more predictable income was desirable.

So they entered an RPI swap: they would pay (monthly or qtrly or whatever) a variable amount indexed to RPI (approximating their income from the property) and would receive a fixed amount, rising at the strike-rate (3.1775%). In combination this would have the effect of fixing the income from their properties at that rate - a 'hedge' against variable income.

But without the property, the swap stood alone - a commitment to pay RPI-related variable amounts and receive 3.1775%. Is this a good deal in its own right ? Only if the future RPI is less than 3.1775%. Will this be the case ? Nobody knows. But at any given time the market will put a forward value on it.

M&B might have just wanted to sit this out, to wait and see. But unfortunately for them they are obliged to 'mark to market' a derivative exposure such as this swap, i.e. recognise its current market value in their books, because it's a huge commitment.

We know what that value was - and that it was negative for them - because they paid up in order to get out of the deal, and reported the amount. So we know the market values RPI at more than 3.1775% just now. From the numbers M&B gave (plus an assumption on the risk-free rate of return, which is not completely transparent for a 30-year deal) - *bingo* - we have the market's current value on 30-year RPI, namely 3.7% (courtesy of Mr Gates' fine software)

This isn't any type of forecast, it's a forward price. But it gives no comfort for anyone fantasising that RPI can somehow be expected to be kept below 3% on a sustained average basis. And absolutely no endorsement for Brown's supposed economic genius ...

tory boys never grow up said...

Oh dear oh dear - I'm afraid you are making the old mistake of assuming that markets are perfect and reading too much into what they imply. For a long period the market used to imply that Northern Rock shares were worth over £10 each and that there was only limited risk in providing funding to sub-prime lending.

What you have noticed is a fairly long standing feature - there is only limited liquidity in the market index linked bonds and that and the tendency of banks offering such derivatives to take a nice fat spread in such situations contribute to the figure you have calculated - which is well above what most reputable economists are forecasting for future inflation.

This is a real issue when it comes to valuing pension scheme liabilities where it is necessary to estimate future RPI and salary rises - and most actuaries have insisted on RPI forecasts based on market rates - however I think you will find that a lot of schemes have compnsated for this by assuming a fairly narrow margin for future pay rises over the (inflated RPI figure)

I bet M&B wish they had a Corporate Treasurer who knew about swaptions - surely he should have asked the question what would have happened if the property deal did not go through. Does actually highlight a problem that Corporate Treasury is not very good in the UK outside the financial sector - and now we are in a period of volatility after a long period of quiet, I expect many similar stories in the near future.

Nick Drew said...

making the old mistake of assuming that markets are perfect and reading too much into what they imply

TB - nope, I chose my words very carefully

"that's what it costs to hedge out your stable economy these days"

"Nobody knows. But at any given time the market will put a forward value on it"

"This isn't any type of forecast, it's a forward price"

I accept, of course, that this isn't the most liquid market and that there will be a juicy spread. However,

(a) the premium was clearly not enough to offset the better financing terms they were working for (promised ?)

(b) the premium "above what most reputable economists are forecasting" is there primarily because of the medium-term volatility / unpredictability needing to be catered for, which is what makes the current situation so problematic, and why anyone would be willing to pay to hedge it out.

My main point was - deflation doesn't feature as a high-probability scenario in any of this

Naturally I also agree that most non-financial corp treasuries are weak. Wonder who pressured them to enter this swap ... - overselling derivatives ? Orange County, anyone ?

Anonymous said...

I think the jury is still out on the inflation question.

Right now the central banks are tending to tackle the issue of a possible recession by reducing interest rates but it is not showing any signs of working. Sure, it worked in the past which is why they are trying it now, but will it work this time? I'm pretty sure that it won't.

We have to remember that what underpins the current crisis is fractional reserve lending. Creating debt out of thin air to give to creditors. When interest rates are low then banks need to shift a lot of loans to make the same profit. They can't do this with just deposits alone so they create debt out of thin air and sell it as a loan. As you know, they can't do this willy-nilly because they have to keep some cash reserves. This is where credit derivatives come into play - because banks use these to sell the debt on and therefore get it off their balance sheets, thus circumventing the rules on reserves. By this means the low interest rates have forced an explosion of debt as the banks have repidly expanded the quantity of loans they have released to make a greater profit from a lower interest rate.

However, now there is no market for credit derivatives as the risk in holding these has become apparent. The banks cannot take the debt off their balance sheets and in fact in many cases have had to put debt back on their balance sheets. Thus some are already infringing rules on cash reserves, preventing them from making further loans. This in itself should cause a collapse in money supply but also as interest rates rise due to the greater risk involved and the need for greater income the consumer switches from spending to saving. Similarly, industry finds high interest rates increasingly punitive and pulls away from investing and M&A activity and aims for higher liquidity instead. The overall impact of this is a collapse in the money supply leading to deflation, if left to its own devices, as the entire global economy switches from spending based on debt to saving and paying down debt (or failing to pay down the debt and defaulting instead).

Currently central banks are trying to cut interest rates to re-inflate the global economy, but you can see in the above scenario that this won't work. The debt based economy has simply hit the end-stops. Nobody wants debt anymore. We are in the same situation as Japan has been for almost 2 decades - extremely low interest rates but nobody interested in investing, leading to deflation and economic stagnation with persistantly high unemployment and severe social problems.

Inflation is only a likely outcome at the present time if the central banks give up trying (and failing) to re-flate the global economy by cutting interest rates and instead simply print money. This would result in a technical default on the global debt on a large scale. Individuals and nations holding large amounts of Western currency (or assets denominated in Western currency) would find these declining rapidly in value. Western currencies would become pariahs. Global trade might be halted in its tracks as traders question the value of paper currencies. But Ben Bernanke has not yet decided to destroy the dollar as the worlds reserve currency, so currently Japanese-style deflation remains the most likely outcome.

Nick Drew said...

RS - excellent, thank you !

PS good to report that Sackers seems to have returned to the fray (they all do, don't they - give 'em a week and the withdrawal symptoms kick in), so the great IN vs DE debate will doubtless continue there

Anonymous said...

"what most reputable economists are forecasting for future inflation." Oh dear, oh dear, are these the reputable economists who failed to forecast the ongoing credit problems, American housing market bust, and so on?
Chocolate teapots.

Ed said...

My survey of one (me) suggests that many consumers are going to switch from spending to saving quite rapidly and quite strongly. But us Brits are addicted to cheap tat so we won't stop spending altogether, and when people's mortgages stop costing so much some of that money will go straight into the shops. My totally ignorant prediction: more likely to have stagflation than a Japanese style depression.

Anonymous said...

ed: Just to clarify something. As I said before banks create debt out of thin air by means of fractional reserve lending. Since this debt is actually indistinguishable from real money, this process actually results in an increase in the UK money supply. This broad money supply is measured by "M4".

When people switch to saving rather than spending on credit, the debt created by fractional reserve lending is swapped for real money, and the net effect is a decrease in the total amount of money in the system as measured by M4. If the production capacity is the same but there is less money in the system you actually get deflation - prices of produced goods must actually decline to find a market. Since this decline in revenue has a negative impact on corporate profits, companies start cutting costs to compensate. Unemployment rises but people in work have to work harder to keep production up.

Deflation tends to be self-sustaining, which is why it is considered to be a grave danger to an economy. Why buy today if the product you want to buy will be cheaper tomorrow? And even cheaper the day after that? People continue to defer spending decisions, preferring to pay down debt instead (because they have seen unemployment rise and they are worried about the state of their finances). By deferring spending the consumer economy collapses, money supply continues to contract as debt is paid down, companies continue to cut costs, unemployment rises still further and so on for years. Eventually all the debt is paid off (or written off) and confidence starts to return, but this can take decades. This is what happened in Japan and also to some extent in Germany where consumers worried about changes to the pension system started saving a greater proportion of their wealth.

It is important for all of us to realise that there really isn't any such thing as a mysterious "business cycle". There is only a credit cycle, with expansions and contractions of the money supply driven by consumer optimism and pessimism and aided and abetted by corrupt government that sees the short term benefit to its electoral chances of credit expansion. Keep money supply growth in check and you will rid yourself of the "boom and bust" cycle. A government that claims "no more boom and bust" but presides over a trebling in the money supply is telling an outright lie.

Sure, we all feel richer when there is more money in the system, but actually we are just mortgaging our future, competing with our neighbours to get into more cheap debt.

I have wondered for some time just how bad the situation could be. Certainly as bad as during the late 70s. But in the late 70s we had enormous spare production capacity and fewer people with huge mortgages. It was possible to dig ourselves out of the mess we were in. Now the levels of debt are so big, extending into all areas of the economy, they vastly exceed the ability of the economy to pay back the debt.

The whole global system is broken. Massive debt and insufficient cash in the system to service the debt. We are heading for a global cash-flow crisis and technical global insolvency. Unless the governments of the world can get together and agree to write off the debt that should never have been allowed to be created, we are heading for a repeat of 1929 and all that followed for 30 years afterward.

Wolfie said...

RS, excellent comment well written.

I just want to pin some detail on this :

Inflation is only a likely outcome at the present time if the central banks give up trying (and failing) to re-flate the global economy by cutting interest rates and instead simply print money.

This is exactly what they have been doing on the quiet and may will continue for a while until their nerve breaks. Then you have the financial "hysteresis" inherent in economic cycles and you end up with :

Short-term inflation (backed by increasing taxation and energy costs) followed by sharp deflation.

Nick Drew said...

great thread, thanks guys

Anonymous said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

Anonymous said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,