Tuesday, 15 April 2008

Capitalists at Leisure: Book Corner


Sex, Science and Profits: How People Evolved to Make Money
Terence Kealey /
Heinemann


Back from hols suitably refreshed, and before anger overtakes me at what I'm reading in the papers of the last 10 days, here's something more constructive: a short review of a very good book.


Coherent arguments based squarely upon inconvenient and messy reality are to be prized above mere ivory-tower hypotheses: and biochemist Kealey genuinely understands the facts of life about us Capitalists. We seek to identify and monopolise market niches (just as successful species dominate niches in nature), to which end we will, inter alia, exert and employ all available ingenuity to advance proprietary technology - and sometimes pure science into the bargain.

Thus, contra Francis Bacon and hordes of vested interests ever since, science is not a public good but a complex private good. As such it should not be funded by the public purse. Throughout all history (which Kealey surveys magisterially, if erratically) science and more especially technology have thrived when allowed to respond to market forces, and have languished or even declined when insulated from markets, e.g. when subsidised by the state. And although the developments thus stimulated start out as proprietary (and are perhaps intended thus to remain), they rarely fail to enter the public domain shortly thereafter. To the benefit of all.

This book is sustained polemic, albeit from an academic operating mostly to high standards of reasoning. It is stylistically casual: “When [eugenicists] encountered the Hardy-Weinberg Principle, they did not cry ‘falsifier, pants on fire!’, they simply ignored it.” “Male chimps obtain the monkey meat. Now, what do female chimps possess that male chimps might fancy in exchange? Yup, you’ve got it.”

And the editing has been casual too: repetition and typos abound and, more seriously, there are a number of discontinuities and even non-sequiturs in the account. But it is unfailingly entertaining and illuminating: most unusually (for me) I found myself starting back at the beginning again as soon as I had read it through. Buy This Book, as they say: you will be enthralled by Kealey’s bravura and compelling account of one aspect of, err, Capitalism at Work.

ND

postscript: for longer reviews than space here permits, go here and here


17 comments:

Schadenfreude said...

Whilst it is true that science benefits little from state subsidy since it fails to apportion the funding to the science with maximum benefit, the same can also be said of private enterprise. Capitalism only wants that science that can improve the effectiveness of existing assets. Capitalists are not so interested in technology that renders existing assets obsolete. Ask any capitalist running a £5bn semiconductor manufacturing facility - do you think they want a revoloutionary technology rendering their investment obsolete? This tends to bias privately funded science towards evolution of existing science rather than revolution.

Entreprenuers like science, but are not always best placed to take advantage of it. In the end they want guaranteed success in the short term.

It is not an easy matter to resolve. The most unlikely science may have the most profound impact on human existence. But perhaps we needn't concern ourselves too much with such things. After half a lifetime of working in technology I haven't see it contribute one iota to net human happiness.

Nick Drew said...

Mr S -

... tends to bias privately funded science towards evolution of existing science

Kealey covers this quite well, showing that many 'revolutions' have been initiated by practical men tinkering purposefully with existing technology; and rather few have been based on applying a breakthrough of pure science (indeed, the steam engine - developed by ill-educated mechanics - disproved the then-current 'scientific' theory of heat)

... net human happiness

surely the net itself brings human happiness ?!
Seriously, I think you would enjoy the book, it is very 'clear-sighted' about capitalism, as should we all be

Anonymous said...

"the steam engine - developed by ill-educated mechanics - disproved the then-current 'scientific' theory of heat)": I take it that that is a reference to Newcomen - if it is intended for Watt, it's wrong by miles.

Schadenfreude said...

"surely the net itself brings human happiness ?!"

Tell that to the many cuckolds that have found their spouse has carried on an affair over the net for years! The law of unintended consequences strikes again! The net improves communication most between people that probably shouldn't be communicating (terrorists, nutcases, kiddie fiddlers)- those that should be communicating were probably communicating already!

Nick Drew said...

dearieme - yes, and also Trevithick and Stephenson.

Watt's story is interesting from a different perspective: as an 'educated' man, Watt rushed to patent his device and charged an onerous licence fee, as a result of which he sold relatively few ! In the 31 years when his patent was in effect, new installations were predominantly of the less advanced Newcomens, and the efficiency of steam engines only increased when Trevithick's greatly superior design was no longer being blocked by Watt's patent.

(Kealey is not a fan of patents ... but I notice from the front of the book that he has asserted his own IP)

Mr S - then I take it you will be re-launching your blog as a private-subscription letter ?!

Anonymous said...

actually the Hardy Weinberg principle doesn't negate eugenics as such it merely means that you have to cast your net very wide and for hundreds of generations to weed out the recessives hidden in the general population.

Baht At

Nick Drew said...

Mr Hatless Anon - thanks for visiting - & contributing the standard of debate around here !

not sure I like the sound of weeding out recessives, though ...

Schadenfreude said...

Nick: with 10 readers max (and one of those is me)I think the most likely thing to happen to my blog is its prompt demise!

Lets face it, the two most dramatic political uses for the internet in the world of British politics would be:-

1] Getting Peter Hain sacked

2] Working out how to blow up lots of "kaffirs".

Whilst [1] would be considered beneficial it hardly outweighs [2] and I don't think my meagre efforts will help redress the balance!

Old BE said...

Can't we have a balance between private R+D and public? I think that sometimes aimless or financially unviable research has its benefits although it is worth mentioning that the USSR developed no new pharmaceuticals despite its heavy research "investment".

The trick is to get the balance right so that state research doesn't crowd out private and vice versa.

I'm not sure how anyone could argue that the widespread dissemination of information is overall a bad thing even though it is true that it is now easier than ever to blow people up on trains. Before the internet, terrorists would just have to use swords or whatever...

Nick Drew said...

Mr S - courage, mon brave ! - we all start somewhere

Mr BE - you just have to read the d****d book ! crowding-out is a real issue, he covers all this stuff very well. If we meet for a beer I will lend you my copy ...

Anonymous said...

Chaucer Quango said...

I think that Gordon brown was terrific at PMQ's
today.
He pummeled Cameron over his poor grasp of the
real economic situation.

The Tory Toff leader was weak and ineffective and
failed to land a single blow.
Brown has really got a grip now, and is more than
a match for him.

Clegg was just insipid. A total waste of a
question.

Make no mistake, Labours fortunes are on the rise.

Nick Drew said...

Mr Quango (any relation ?), you are the very man I was hoping to meet, I have a little wager for you ...

Bill Quango MP said...

sorry just a post for the benefit of the Guido crowd. That Chaucer is gone now.

Anonymous said...

Ah, you mean the kind of people that realise that there was no PMQs today?

Old BE said...

ND - I may yet take you up on that offer :-)

Anonymous said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

Anonymous said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,