Thursday, 22 May 2008

Polyclinics: Poll Tax on Steroids


No surprises that NuLab’s Stalinist tendency has come up with Polyclinics as the latest in its plans for mass centralisation. One’s hostile instincts are reinforced by reading guff like Ignore GPs: Polyclinics are the future from David ‘former communist’ Aaronovitch; and a moment’s research into the ‘consultations’ that are being conducted will reveal (a) there is strong grass-roots opposition and (b) the government intends to go ahead anyway, with PCTs under enormous pressure to get GPs in line (and PCTs have many instruments of torture with which to threaten a GP).

The Conservative Party is officially skeptical. But one sometimes finds senior Tories ambivalent, often having being approached for support by the PCTs and GPs who have been got at already. There will be a lot of money involved, and Big Business is waiting in the wings …

As ever, the centralist argument is the classic one: efficiency through uniformity and scale. You’ll rarely read the true story because there is a deal of pussy-footing around on the issue: and there’s more than money at stake. One of the thrusts for Polyclinics is to extend NHS treatment to ‘increasingly transient populations’ – code for ‘people who don’t actually have the right’. Another is to be able better to enforce politically-set healthcare goals.

And the main losers will be a group known in NHS planning circles as the “White Well”. This means middle class white folk, who keep themselves in good shape by being fairly ready to seek prompt attention from an NHS GP they know well, but who would be very much less likely to attend a vast, impersonal Polyclinic in a timely fashion for this niggling pain here or that minor ailment there.

Any ‘efficiency’ gains from putting the squeeze thus on the White Well will be more than squandered, not only by reduced amounts of preventative medicine being carried out, but by a huge upsurge in time spent on another significant category – the malingerers, hypochondriacs and general timewasters. GPs, of course, know exactly who they are, and can handle them fairly efficiently. But as it’s illegal, apparently, to mark patients’ notes ‘timewaster, big clinics will be forced to go through the whole rigmarole every time - just as A&E departments are at present. (During public holidays and big football matches, Casualty units are populated almost entirely by these unfortunates, who enjoy the undivided attention they get.)

Opposition parties need to line up solidly with their supporters on this issue and ignore the siren voices of PCT and big-Pharma lobbyists. In frontline healthcare, small is beautiful. The Polyclinic could be the final nail in NuLab’s coffin.

ND

9 comments:

Ed said...

Polyclinics fill me with horror. As you say, "frontline" services should be as local as possible. GP services should look like country solicitors or one-man-band accountants not like Microsoft.

The idea that centralisation+uniformity=efficiency is nonsense, but a lot of it is driven by "the postcode lottery". In fact localism is the solution because then people have a way to indicate how they want their services configured rather than them being dictated to from on high. The Tories should push strongly on this because I think it is right and also could be very popular.

roym said...

the white well? what is this tosh?

i was beginning to like this blog, but this particular post reads like hysteria from the daily wail.

are you seriously trying to suggest that white middle-class types are incapable of wasting GPs time? or they wouldnt go to a polyclinic if they really were feeling unwell?

getting more on track is the fact that the corporates are hovering over this as a new growth market. sad days

James Higham said...

No surprises that NuLab’s Stalinist tendency has come up with Polyclinics as the latest in its plans for mass centralisation.

Makes me feel right at home - we have heaps of them round here.

Raedwald said...

If you hold onto the idea of GPs having prime purchasing power for specialist services, and therefore delegating most of the necessary rationing decisions to them, surely the invisible hand will determine the rest.

Independent Cottage Hospitals could offer cost effective obstetric, gynae and minor surgical procedures as well as stuff such as phlebotomy and bog standard radiology

County, teaching, specialist and Borough hospitals could provide A&E (paid for by central tax subventions rather than GP fundholders), major surgery, CAT scans and other specialist treatments.

The trick would be to make easily available the health 'performance indicators' at GP partnership level; poor budgeting and purchasing decisions as well as poor diagnosis and prescribing by sub-standard GP practices would show up fairly quickly and as their patient rolls fell so would their delegated budget.

GPs surgeries would have complete freedom to determine their own opening hours and days, and appointment conditions, and citizens complete freedom to choose which GP they register with.

Yes, local determination and not the dead Stalinist hand of the Central State.

Socialists will argue that GPs in 'White well' areas with excellent performances will enjoy an inefficient surplus on a basis of a standard per-capita budget on the basis of their rolls. Not so. It hasn't been the case with schools, has it? Good schools are over subscribed. Good GPs will be oversubscribed.

I want to be able to talk to the doctors who have the rationing power. Only they can assess 'quality of life' factors. The health care rationing decisions they make are why we train them for so long and so thoroughly. Let's give our professionals back their proper role and rid ourselves of amorphous grey bureaucrats, political interference and the horrid hand of the Central State.

Anonymous said...

So what's the difference between the local district hospital which has just been closed and the new polyclinic which is just about to be opened? I am confused.

Nick Drew said...

thanks for coming by, Raedwald. This, surely, is an area in which localism can be promoted without hesitation. I worry about some Tories' equivocation - their instincts for decentralisation are sometimes as suspect as their noses for a votewinner !

GG - the answer is, the local GPs will be herded into the Polyclinic.

And they will be Big: in London the aim is for one clinic per 50,000 people - equating to around 5 wards, in polling terms - within which area there would then be no freestanding NHS GP practices.

Ed said...

Which also means not within walking distance for many people, which means ambulances or driving for relatively minor stuff. Gah.

Anonymous said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

Anonymous said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,