Tuesday, 10 February 2009

Bankers: "No-one Foresaw" - Excuse Me ?!

The inquisition of the bankers gives rise to many fascinating points which we may pick up in future, but for now here's one I just can't resist. Their risk management systems were all excellent, of course; they all discussed risk ad nauseam in their Board meetings, they all did their stress-testing etc etc, but no-one foresaw ... in particular, no-one foresaw the [2008] Lehman collapse.

Well, obviously no-one that matters but, ahem, this from October 2007:

"Stress Tests - one problem is paucity of imagination: the worst we can envisage is what has happened before. When oil was last at $10 (1998!), very few companies were stress-testing for $80 ... who is modeling the collapse of a really big bank now?"

Modesty forbids ...

ND

19 comments:

Blue Eyes said...

Wasn't the whole crisis based on the obviously incorrect assumption that house prices could only ever go up? Did they not "stress test" the idea that prices might go down as they have at some point in virtually every decade?

Richard Elliot said...

BE - I think it has been a bit more complicated than that for the big banks. The commodities, equities, rates, FX desks etc... don't trade house prices. They need to stress test the assets in their segment of the market not house prices.

Agree with ND's point on a lack of foresight. Having recently been on the inside though I can see why it happens. Stress testing is not glamourous and sucks resources away from more "sexy" things, so is always under pressure.

Nick Drew said...

BE, Richard - the Committee proceedings this morning did little to dispel the unkind conclusion that a key reason is circle-jerking

who wants to step outside a circle that's having so much fun ?

and anyone who does (e.g. the poor HBOS risk manager they discussed at such great length and to so little effect), is clearly nuts and therefore to be ignored / fired / both

there really was some shocking stuff today (in amongst all the crocodile tears and flannel) - material for many a post !

Blue Eyes said...

Err, Richard we are told that the root of all this are the weird and wonderful packages of bonds made up of home loans... How can banks not be trading house prices if they are trading bonds based on them?

Or did something else cause the crunch which I haven't heard of yet?

Richard Elliot said...

The banks have lost a lot of money on the toxic bonds, but they have been losing money all across their other businesses as well.

I'll explain my rationale over a pint sometime!

Sebastian Weetabix said...

The real problem lies in ourselves, not in our stars... most people simply lack the moral courage to be the man in the Bateman cartoon who stands up & says "this is wrong, it is all going to end in tears". And of course management is always promoting the awkward squad...not. Self interest says it's much better to keep shtum & pocket the bonus cheques.

I don't believe for one minute these people didn't see something of this sort happening (though I doubt they forsaw the magnitude of it). They probably thought of it like a game of pass the parcel, & hoped they wouldn't be holding it when the music finally stopped.

Mark Wadsworth said...

What BE says (both comments).

The previous three house price bubbles in the UK since 1945 were followed by a house price crash and lots of bank and currency nastiness. This last boom was twice as big as the others. Draw your own conclusions.

Alex said...

Mr Weetabix:

I agree with your point. It comes in part from a trading mentality that likes to think that the market is always there and what is sold or hedged is no longer an issue.

I blogged on this here:
http://alexmasterley.blogspot.com/2009/02/second-opinion.html

The Great Simpleton said...

Perhaps ther weren't allowed to finish and were going to say:

....no-one foresaw the Lehman collapse being allowed to happen by the US Govt.

Steven_L said...

I must say I agree with the stuff everyone is saying about no-one wanting to rock the boat.

I've rocked the boat in a few jobs that I knew I would be leaving in the near future and didn't really care about, just for a laugh.

In my experience managers really, really hate it when you point out to all their staff that there is even the slightest possibility that they are talking absolute bollocks.

Plus, all large organisations do their upmost and best to brainwash all their employees anyway, so even when you do point out something might be a load of bollocks, everyone just goes into a weird sort of denial.

In chess, it is important not to make the mistake of believing your opponent understands a complicated position more that you do.

I think that everyone, politicans, regulators, bankers and consumers made precisely that mistake and just assumed that someone else, somewhere knew what they were doing.

Sebastian Weetabix said...

Alex, I liked your post. Sort of: "if we're wrong then everyone's wrong & we're all screwed" Safety in numbers....

Steven_L: I used to work for a humongous German company who shall remain nameless. I won't call them multi-national as they were (& probably still are) more multi-local in nature, always with a Heinie in charge in each country & of each major department. Naturally they still ladelled out guff about commitment to diversity/openness despite all evidence to the contrary.

Anyhoo, the internal joke was that the people at the bottom spent their days going around the system to get things done; the people in the middle spent their days covering up the fact that the system was not only being subverted, but HAD to be subverted to get anything done, while the people at the top believed the system worked & was loved by the drones. The final straw for me was going along to a "consulting & feedback session" & hearing the German VP berate an employee for providing perfectly innocuous feedback which was - and I quote this verbatim - "outside acceptable limits". It is not enough to tell lies, it is necessary for the great unwashed to be seen to accept it!

Now I am a director of a small company with international pretensions (we have an office in the USA & in China) I daresay I am subject to similar delusions. I do try to be open-minded but sometimes chaps do go too far - for example, I once invited opinions & was told by a tired & emotional salesman that I was "a f***ing c***". I told him he was right, and for that reason alone I was going to sack him within 5 seconds if he didn't quit. The rush of executive power was quite heady; if it weren't for employment law I'd be Capt. Bligh by now.

Nick Drew said...

SW, SL - yes, culture of not-rocking-the-boat is pretty endemic, & actually rather easily understood in a basic human sort of way

doesn't make it right

we may be hearing more from the fired HBOS risk manager (hopefully !)

I could tell a few stories meself ...

Alex - good technical points in your post

DorsetDipper said...

foreseeing this in Oct 2007 is no big deal.

From the FX markets, the first wobble was in March 2007 when Bernanke warned on the size of Subprime debt, but it wobbled and no more. The second was in August 2007 when, for want of a better description, it was like a trap-door had opened under the market and some participants were falling. All the risk measures - implied vols, and risk-reversals, blew out.

The die was cast on that day, and getting out of anything big afterwards was impossible.

Unsworth said...

Yes you're absolutely right, you and some others were accurately forecasting the current disaster(s) a long time ago.

However, this appearance before the Commons Committee is, as we all know, just the usual ritual 'humiliation'. And we know that in fact this makes almost no difference whatsoever.

Indeed, those bankers who were taking part in this charade will certainly be generously recompensed for their inconvenience - just give it a few months for things to quieten down.

Prodicus said...

I hope you saw (and enjoyed as much as I did) Hugh Hendry on Jeff Randall's prog on Sky tonight. Lipsmacking.

Nick Drew said...

DD - and of course I'm not claiming it was a big deal, that's the whole point ! It was an obvious thing to do by that stage - and they didn't

Unsworth - public floggings have their place ! and actually, as CU says this morning, there is actually the possibility that something worthwhile comes out of it

Prodicus - thanks for the link. Have to agree with him on short-sellers being the ultimate message-bearers: it was a couple of very hi-profile shorts that first put the skids under Enron, not the rating agencies or analysts who were all completely star-struck

look said...

aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,

做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,

uhfdf said...

情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 言情小說, 愛情小說, 色情A片, 情色論壇, 色情影片, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊美女, 視訊交友, ut聊天室, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, a片下載, av片, A漫, av dvd, av成人網, 聊天室, 成人論壇, 本土自拍, 自拍, A片, 愛情公寓, 情色, 舊情人, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 情色交友, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊, 情色電影, aio交友愛情館, 色情a片, 一夜情, 辣妹視訊, 視訊聊天室, 免費視訊聊天, 免費視訊, 視訊, 視訊美女, 美女視訊, 視訊交友, 視訊聊天, 免費視訊聊天室, 情人視訊網, 影音視訊聊天室, 視訊交友90739, 成人影片, 成人交友,

免費A片, 本土自拍, AV女優, 美女視訊, 情色交友, 免費AV, 色情網站, 辣妹視訊, 美女交友, 色情影片, 成人影片, 成人網站, A片,H漫, 18成人, 成人圖片, 成人漫畫, 情色網, 日本A片, 免費A片下載, 性愛, 成人交友, 嘟嘟成人網, 成人電影, 成人, 成人貼圖, 成人小說, 成人文章, 成人圖片區, 免費成人影片, 成人遊戲, 微風成人, 愛情公寓, 情色, 情色貼圖, 情色文學, 做愛, 色情聊天室, 色情小說, 一葉情貼圖片區, 情色小說, 色情, 寄情築園小遊戲, 色情遊戲, 情色視訊,

will said...

A片,A片,A片,A片,A片,A片情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣商品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品.情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,視訊聊天室,情趣,情趣用品,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣麻將,台灣彩卷,六合彩開獎號碼,運動彩卷,六合彩,遊戲,線上遊戲,cs online,搓麻將,矽谷麻將,明星三缺一, 橘子町,麻將大悶鍋,台客麻將,公博,game,,中華職棒,麗的線上小遊戲,國士無雙麻將,麻將館,賭博遊戲,威力彩,威力彩開獎號碼,龍龍運動網,史萊姆,史萊姆好玩遊戲,史萊姆第一個家,史萊姆好玩遊戲區,樂透彩開獎號碼,遊戲天堂,天堂,好玩遊戲,遊戲基地,無料遊戲王,好玩遊戲區,麻將遊戲,好玩遊戲區,小遊戲,電玩快打情趣用品,情趣,A片,AIO,AV,AV女優,A漫,免費A片,情色,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色文學,色情,寄情竹園小遊戲,色情遊戲,AIO交友愛情館,色情影片,情趣內衣,情趣睡衣,性感睡衣,情趣商品,微風成人,嘟嘟成人網,成人,18成人,成人影城,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,UT聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室 ,哈啦聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,080苗栗人聊天室,080聊天室,視訊交友網,視訊借錢,黃金,黃金回收,黃金價格,黃金買賣,當舖,中古車,二手車A片,A片,成人網站,成人影片,色情,情色網,情色,AV,AV女優,成人影城,成人,色情A片,日本AV,免費成人影片,成人影片,SEX,免費A片,A片下載,免費A片下載,做愛,情色A片,色情影片,H漫,A漫,18成人,情色電影,自拍,成人電影a片,色情影片,情色電影,a片,色情,情色網,情色,av,av女優,成人影城,成人,色情a片,日本av,免費成人影片,成人影片,情色a片,sex,免費a片,a片下載,免費a片下載,成人網站,做愛,自拍A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人光碟18成人,成人聊天室,成人電影,成人圖片,成人貼圖,成人圖片區,成人影片,成人文章,成人小說,微風成人區,成人交友,成人文學,成人漫畫,成人遊戲,免費成人影片 ,成人論壇,愛情公寓,情色,色情網站,情色A片,色情小說,情色文學