It has always been obvious that when actual Warming became a clear and present global danger, geo-engineering would hove rapidly into view. It's so obvious: we all know how to reduce ambient temperature - indeed Krakatoa2 could do it for us at any time! CO2 "control" was always an indirect proxy for the actual objective - temperature control. And here it comes.
The swampy-leftie-greenies Really, Really Hate This - because it's a scientific solution executed by industrial means, as opposed to just de-industrialising and living in caves. I suspect the non-swampies on the green left hate it on slightly different grounds: because they kinda feel they could take control of current "green" policies (though personally I doubt it, see my several posts on how it's mainstream Bizness & Finance now, and has been since 2019) - see Ed Miliband's recent outpouring.**
But the World Government types will easily "pivot" towards it (I think that's the modern phraseology), because of course you can't have geo-engineering being done on any other basis. Unilateral geo-engineering? - perish the thought!
Well, they may be wrong again. Because three very big players will be having none of that: China, Russia and (mark my words) the USA, even under Biden. Unilateral actions will start, just as soon as they are thoroughly fed up of forest fires etc.
Watch it happen.
** can't vouch for the accuracy of this, but I read that when Mili gave his speech online it attracted, *ahem*, 76 viewers ...
PS: of high comedic value, Miliband (very wealthy man on reasonably high salary) - advocating we all get electric cars - admitted on air he doesn't have one! Blamed it on lack of zero-interest loans and scrappage scheme. Pr**k.