Continued from last week
So what disturbed Allcock's stately scam ship as it sailed serenely through the market? The first issue arose in the mid '80s when the laws of supply / demand / price caught up with him, as they always do eventually. You can suspend the laws of nature, but only for as long as you are willing to throw money at it.
What happened was this. He'd secured vast quantities of gas at ultra low prices (the units don't matter, but it was single-digit pence per therm) in the late '60s and early '70s - see part 1. This was amply sufficient, right through the 70's. But by the '80s there had been two oil crises, 1973 and 1979; and the price of oil had risen tenfold (sic). The prices BG was paying for its gas had jogged upwards a bit with inflation and other adjustments, but nothing on that scale. So the big producers, who were always oil companies au fond,[1] stopped drilling for gas, concentrating on the still bounteous North Sea oil reserves. There were whole years in the '80s where not a single gas well was drilled - not for exploration, nor even for extending already-producing gas fields. A complete gas-investment strike by the producers. BG did the sums, and correctly assessed they'd be facing a supply crisis in due course. And new gasfields took an absolute minimum of 2 years to bring onstream[2], often much longer if outright new exploration was to be involved.
Still, BG had a monopoly to go with its monopsony, and they knew who was going to pay for the business of digging them out of that hole - its captive customers! So Allcock did the rounds of the big producers, intimating that BG was now willing to pay prices above 20 p/th - a huge increase - for any new gas fields they could bring to the table in the next few years. This, of course, set off a new round of stately and highly enjoyable negotiations I described last time, as the producers dug down into the archives for overlooked gas discoveries, and indeed started drilling again for new resources. It worked: high prices have that effect. (I've written before about another, hilarious aspect of this episode as the crazy, artificial boom-and-bust cycle ran its inevitable course.) Thus did Allcock and his monopoly powers - a dismally blunt instrument indeed - avert the first storm that broke over his head.
The second, however, was to be terminal, albeit a protracted affair. On purely ideological grounds, Nigel Lawson persuaded Thatcher to privatise BG, a task given to Peter Walker. To make a long story short, in 1986 he succeeded in getting the public to buy the shares ("Tell Sid", for those with 40-year memories), and the legislation ended BG's de jure monopoly / monopsony. But it did nothing to eliminate or even, in the short- to medium-term undermine, its de facto stranglehold, not least because in the initial legislation, no regulator was appointed!
And it was Allcock who commanded BG's first and highly effective line of defence: making sure no other bugger could obtain gas with which to go into competition with the monopoly. In the next part we'll tell the story of his long, ruthless but ultimately unsuccessful rearguard action. And, no, I haven't forgotten the promised account of the colourful abuses of its monopoly that BG perpetrated over the years - some of which will feature in part 3 and others in a later episode.
ND
______________________________
[1] Gas was always seen as a more-or-less unwanted by-product - something that came up from most oil-wells anyway, or something you discovered, disappointingly, when you'd really been looking for oil. In some places around the world, by-product gas was simply flared
[2] A lead time as short as 2 years would be for a geologically simple gas field in shallow waters, close to existing infrastructure, that had already been discovered but never developed because the price BG had been willing to pay was just too low - the producer had better uses for its development budget
6 comments:
British Gas.
When my ex and I bought our first house in Oxford in 1978 (£11k. Now over £500k. Straight onto pavement, tiny back yard, which did go straight onto a lovely meadow that was common land), there was a gas pipe. Not gas white goods.
Go down the Gas Board. Can you turn our gas on?
Later they tell us that can't be done without a cooker or whatever.
Ok, can we buy a cooker.
Not till the gas is turned back on.
Godstrewth that is a true story.
A phone call and some banging of heads sorted that out...
As for BT, no... .stop me
In an age that has seen Toni Blair and Lord Mandelbum, your ogre seems rather small beer.
I like the casual way Mandelson copies Cabinet emails straight to Epstein.
Question in my mind is how well versed in financial shenanigans were the Civil Servants and Ministers involved in gas privatisation?
My contact was mainly in telcoms and Ofcom seemed mainly interested in keeping 'an orderly market'. My employer was hired by an Australian big shot and sent him and one of our more wily operators to visit some northern water companies.
The message I got was that those at the top of the water companies were very sharp operators and could see which side their bread was buttered and also knew where the bodies were buried. My wily friend declared 'what a bunch of operators!'. Simple plumbers they were not.
Back at the camp I suppose HM Treasury was only too glad to unload the water companies for cash having spent very little on infrastructure - physical or managerial. Not in to good a position to haggle and not motivated to look to the future. Ofwat was seen coming a mile off and notions of financial manipulation and engineering were not in their mindset. HM Treasury not in a position to make waves and whatever Minister was supposed to be on the job would be gone by next week.
Possibly we got away lightly with telecoms and gas - or maybe there was more money in the pot so the shenanigans did not notice so much.
Last few day's scandals suggest 'wider you open the window, the more the dirt flies in'.
It seems that "Bobby" is in a heap of trouble. Long overdue. Hubris and all that.
Still, he might have fun in prison 🤣🤣🤣
Were it to be that this brings Starmer down, singing and dancing in the streets.
Anyway, only another 3 1/2 years of this hell.
Horribly ot, but what were MI5 and especially MI6 doing while Epstein was handing out party invites to selected Royals and senior Government ministers? Isn't it one of their jobs to monitor that sort of thing? "Foreign Agents " and all that? That's the dog that hasn't barked.
Post a Comment