Wednesday, 23 July 2008
Where is Cameron's Glasgow East ?
Glasgow East is the 25th safest Labour seat with a 13507 {43.66%} according to Constituencies in order of % Majority after the 2005 General Election.
The current polls are still predicting a Labour win but there is talk of a majority of hundreds, not thousands according to The Telegraph
There are 41 similar safe seats before the first Conservative seat appears on the board. That is Kensington and Chelsea with 12148 majority.
Now, to put this in a Conservative perspective, it is as if the Tories were desperately trying to hang on to their safest seat. The average voter in Chelsea is as likely to vote Labour as they are to eat spam fritters. I expect the average voter in Glasgow East is as likely to vote Conservative as it is to holiday in Aspen.
The 24th safest Tory seat is Runnymede and Weybridge. I choose the 24th as it is where I used to live and the figures are near enough. Runnymede and Weybridge majority 12349 {28.37%}.
This is ABC 1 territory. The highest social status and many of the highest earners in the country.
Smack in the middle of the stockbroker commuter belt. Average price of a modest 3 bedroom home £300,000. Good schools, transport links to 4 international airports, 30 minute train to Waterloo, multi-multi multi - million pound homes, championship golf couses and low crime. The prosperous blue heartland.
Imagine holding somewhere like that with a majority of 13500 and coming away with 800.
And then being pleased because it was a win.
No. It would be a catastrophe that would undeniably cost the leader their job.
Labour may well do much better than that. In the current economic and political climate some allowances need to be made.
7000+ very credible
5000+ good
3000+ weak but spin able
1000+ disturbing in the extreme
1+ the hollowest of victories
The fact that talk of a win as somehow good and a step towards regaining the initiative shows even more clearly than Crewe exactly how far Labour's stock has fallen. It should be nothing less than a very comfortable win.
Whatever the result I confidently predict the phrase Eastbourne in 1990 to be a recurring theme.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
11 comments:
As somebody once said, 'Losers vote Labour".
Labour need a big victory as the SNP will jump all over them if the victory margin is less than several thousand.
MW - Labour's trick in 97 was to pretend to be the "aspirational" party as well as the party for those who don't think they can do any better under their own steam.
Anything less than a thumping Labour majority would be highly damaging as BQ says, but don't expect to see any leftwing commentators admitting it.
I still think Labour will win as they inherit the vote there in Glasgae...
Mutley: It would be amazing if they didn't win. Same as Chelsea is inconceivable to be anything but Tory. But imagine its 5000. That means some 8500 voters or 63% of the voters who voted Labour last time deserting them.
They would be pretty pleased with 5000, but it isn't enough.
LFAT:I think they have spent so many decades in control in Scotland that it was taken for granted that they would always retain it.
They hadn't needed to campaign or do much of anything to win.
Once the SNP got its act together they were challenged and had to have answers and explain actions.
BE: Quite so. A New Labour indeed. end to sleaze, end to privatisation, tough on crime and the causes of crime, education education education , balancing the books, housing for all, massive investment in public transport, an end to road building, total reform of the NHS, joining the Euro, end to the House of Lords, ban foxhunting, minimum wage, training for all....
Wonder why they didn't do all this, instead of pretending to do it.
If they had achieved even a third of what they claim to have achieved they would still be high in the polls.
Simple, because they never actually wanted to do that. They said enough to get elected and had a credible front man but once in power just tinkered with things in the hope that they could move the country in the direction they actually believe in without too many people noticing.
We did notice but many allowed them to get away with it while the economy "boomed".
In 97 Labour were a total unknown quantity, which is why the phrase Things Can Only Get Better resonated so well with the public. They are not now an unknown quantity, and further, have, basically, fucked things up royally in almost every and any way. The Labour party can never, ever, become New Labour again without reminding people of this, and that is their problem for the future and why they will not get back in for many years to come.
If you want to know what kind of cretins vote Labour, and what kind of cretins are Labour, just go and see good old Bob Pipers blog. He is proud of Labour and was seen to say to a Tory commenter, Read em and weep, three elections in a row, so we must have been doing something right ..... forgetting of course that the Tories won four previously. This is the mentality of Labour and their supporters; dressed up to look reasonable and rational, but underlying delusion and pettiness is the true face of Labour.
There are no champagne socialists really; people like Tony Bliar and most of the PLP are people who are not good enough to be in the other parties. Look at Hilary Benn, what does he know about working class? And the list goes on and on like Geoffrey Robinson. They are individuals who are mentally sub standard and so go to where they may shine, Labour, or are vindictive and petty individuals with a lack of talent who shine in company like Prescott. So don't blame the East End.
If Labour don't win this by election with 5-10,000 majority they are in serious trouble. I think they will win by at least 2000, possibly up to 5000, though I hope I'm wrong and they lose; they deserve to.
What's wrong with spam fritters?
"7000+ very credible
5000+ good
3000+ weak but spin able
1000+ disturbing in the extreme
1+ the hollowest of victories"
and actually losing the seat?
Not a Sheep..
you see through my predictions.
I never seriously considered it a possibility, what with the hundreds of labour activists, orders to Mps to visit and knock doors, a feisty 'old style socialist candidate'60 years of dominance and more.
The loss is unspinable as has been seen today.
Some cabinet ministers have given it a good go but the PM's identical comment of the same tractor production style "getting on with the job - steering a course -best placed to deal with - economic turmoil - party of substance" blah blah is totally ineffective.
Unbelievable soundbites delivered in a tedious monotonous dull style.
John Major is back!
Someone with more technical skill than me will no doubt get his youtube statements from Crewe, Henley, Glasgow, London, 10p tax, Northern rock, local elections and splice them together.
Same words with different backgrounds.
"listening-listening - listening -listening -to the message we have been sent..
learn-learning -learning -learning the lessons."
aaaa片, 免費聊天, 咆哮小老鼠影片分享區, 金瓶梅影片, av女優王國, 78論壇, 女同聊天室, 熟女貼圖, 1069壞朋友論壇gay, 淫蕩少女總部, 日本情色派, 平水相逢, 黑澀會美眉無名, 網路小說免費看, 999東洋成人, 免費視訊聊天, 情色電影分享區, 9k躺伯虎聊天室, 傑克論壇, 日本女星杉本彩寫真, 自拍電影免費下載, a片論壇, 情色短片試看, 素人自拍寫真, 免費成人影音, 彩虹自拍, 小魔女貼影片, 自拍裸體寫真, 禿頭俱樂部, 環球av影音城, 學生色情聊天室, 視訊美女, 辣妹情色圖, 性感卡通美女圖片, 影音, 情色照片 做愛, hilive tv , 忘年之交聊天室, 制服美女, 性感辣妹, ut 女同聊天室, 淫蕩自拍, 處女貼圖貼片區, 聊天ukiss tw, 亞亞成人館, 777成人, 秋瓷炫裸體寫真, 淫蕩天使貼圖, 十八禁成人影音, 禁地論壇, 洪爺淫蕩自拍, 秘書自拍圖片,
做愛的漫畫圖片, 情色電影分享區, 做愛ㄉ影片, 丁字褲美女寫真, 色美眉, 自拍俱樂部首頁, 日本偷自拍圖片, 色情做愛影片, 情色貼圖區, 八國聯軍情色網, 免費線上a片, 淫蕩女孩自拍, 美國a片, 都都成人站, 色情自拍, 本土自拍照片, 熊貓貼圖區, 色情影片, 5278影片網, 脫星寫真圖片, 粉喵聊天室, 金瓶梅18, sex888影片分享區, 1007視訊, 雙贏論壇, 爆爆爽a片免費看, 天堂私服論壇, 情色電影下載, 成人短片, 麗的線上情色小遊戲, 情色動畫免費下載, 日本女優, 小說論壇, 777成人區, showlive影音聊天網, 聊天室尋夢園, 義大利女星寫真集, 韓國a片, 熟女人妻援交, 0204成人, 性感內衣模特兒, 影片, 情色卡通, 85cc免費影城85cc, 本土自拍照片, 成人漫畫區, 18禁, 情人節阿性,
Post a Comment