Wednesday, 16 May 2012

JP Morgan: Rum

You don't need us to give you links to the current slew of lurid JP Morgan / London Whale stories: you can hardly move for them.  And what about that Ina Drew, eh?  (Must be OK with a name like that.)  Her with the "enviable reputation as one of its best managers of balance sheet risk" - and the $32m pay-off.  Nice work !

But if this seems to have come from out of a clear blue sky, here are a couple of suggestions for google searches in a quiet moment.  Try JP Morgan / silver:  the word 'manipulation' pops up before you've barely entered s-i-l-v, and you'll need a whole afternoon to sift what you find.  Or you could try prospecting for JP Morgan / gold -  blow me, it's 'manipulation' again, and away you go for another afternoon at the races.  (That Blythe Masters ... what a gal!  Imagine her pay-off when she retires.)

Then type in JP Morgan / coal: the word 'loss' will beat you to the punch, and you're off on another fascinating thread.

Seems these chaps have, errr, form: it's beginning to look distinctly careless.  Either that or Astonishing Bad Luck.  And some rather unenviable public relations episodes, too.  What are we to think ?

ND

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

The dangerous power of political lies

When I started this blog in 2006, one of the main drivers was to discuss the intersection of business and politics. With hindsight, in the midst of a leveraged fulled boom and several years of stable Labour government in the UK, this was not a topic high on many peoples' agendas.

How much has changed since, here we are 6 years later and there is a visceral fight to the death between politicians and the markets. In Europe, populist politicians, ignorant of anything economic, have led a campaign of 'anti-austerity'. As if there is some kind of valid choice. Of course, the people are also not well informed and it is part of human nature to hope there is a better answer to all life's challenges - the cancer can be cured, the relationship saved, the house afforded etc.

But now to peddle this fantasy is a dangerous lie. There is a simple choice, repay debts or default. Promising instead 'Growth' is a nonsense. Governments cannot create growth, only can they create the environment for it. Of course, this does nto stop Governments trying, which is why the size of the state rises inexorably across European countries as Governments try to deliver on their impossible promises.

The limits of this attempt have now been discovered. Vast monies have been spent on welfare states with 50% of GDP coming from Governments who at most raise 40% in taxes. No more can this be sustained without the reductions in Government spending. This is of course very painful for the populations.

The alternative though is default and Euro exit, not some dreamland 'third way.' Thus this promise of an end to austerity is the worst kind of fantasy - lying to gain votes and then potentially tipping countries into an economic darkness for which they are unprepared. Here sits the Greek Party Syriza. Europe has a history of this, the last great depression of the 1930's also led to populist, nationalist, socialist governments to come to power. Promising people an economic fairy tale they could not deliver on.

The collapse in Greece is however, sadly, to be expected. Too far gone are the debt dynamics to save Greece and too incompetent the Government structures to be trusted with another bailout (but, yet it may come in one scenario).

With all this populist outrage across the channel, the UK has its own promoters too. The siren calls of the Labour party and its Union masters mimic the same tune - no cuts! no austerity! nothing to change! tax the rich! create growth with greater debt!

For many people, this is the nirvana mix in the current economic dark days. Why should we have worse schools, hospitals etc, why can't things be different?

Yet of course, Labour have no alternative, no different policy. Darling's predictions pre-election 2010 and Osborne's response have been similar to within a few percentage points. So this outrage is entirely manufactured - the job of opposition, perhaps one might say with a shrug of the shoulders.

The Tories for their part, with the Lib Dems, have a terrible hand to play and are doing an average job - when we needed an excellent Government. But even so, the damage caused by Labour lies is telling. The people believe in wishful fantasy alternative, not aware that Britain and Greece share many of the same, frightening, economic statistics. Only the Pound and the Printing presses (and the City, able to secure money for its host nation whilst turning a blind eye in a way that Eurozone states could not expect) keep the UK relatively afloat.

So finally, the Great Lie; The Euro. A political project without economic merit, which has sunk the periphery nations of Europe and enriched Germany and the northern states. A credible plan to end the currency area over a 2 year period is needed. The markets and economics cry out for this. Instead, Politicians proceed as if this is impossible - when even now discussing kicking out Greece. A Grexit will lead to a run on Portugal and Spain - so bad is this end that another bailout would be much cheaper. The lie though must continue, Europe is a single currency area and countries and adjust internally, even whilst demand collapses. A complete fantasy - but an acceptable one. Greeks still want Euro's, even after the tragedy it has inflicted on the Country - there we have it in pure essence, the power of political lies.

Monday, 14 May 2012

People. Fear. Change.

Some years ago when I was a councillor, I attended a big public meeting called by London Transport, as it was then. The occasion was 'Consultation' on a plan to improve the bus services for a huge, sprawling, isolated council estate (covering 2 entire electoral wards, if that helps to convey the scale) that was fairly dependent on said buses.  LT's plan was radical but clever and - history records - was in due course implemented with great success.

But that was all in the future. At the meeting, speaker after speaker rose from the floor to thunderous applause, and they each the same two points: (1) the current bus service is crap;  (2) nothing must be fundamentally changed.  As Einstein said:  "Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results".

This, then, is the human condition, the very basic stuff of politics.

Michael Portillo's TV essay on the Great Euro Crisis (Wednesday of last week) brought all this to mind**.  There he was, interviewing every Greek and German citizen high and low that he could lay his camera on, getting them to illustrate his thesis and, sometimes, to agree with it flat out; namely that current euro set-up lay at the root of their problems.  But with a single and non-representative exception, none of them would abandon the Euro.

Innate conservatism ? Fear of something worse ? Expression of deep-seated support for the federast euro-project ?  

Probably not quite the last of those; although we in this island have very little intuitive grasp of how far enthusiasm for that project runs in many quarters.  But the humano-political condition was on full display.

And something else, which is fairly germane to these considerations: no-one was particularly exercised over the anti-democratic aspects of the major political interventions of the last 9 months' and more.  Oh yes, democracy comes a pretty poor third, or worse, after 'jam tomorrow' and 'grass is greener'.  The senior German minister interviewed, Wolfgang Schäuble was particularly sinister on this: MEPs are elected, he beamed - what more do you want ?

Not hard to see how demagogues play their hands in such circumstances, and how Europe ended up under the totalitarians in the 1930's.  One way or the other.  Yes, London Transport simply ignored all those speeches from the floor.

Well. What else could they do ?

N

** Literary allusion: geddit ? small prize for correct answer 

UPDATE  Purplepangolin  was on this like a shot, identifying it as Yeats (and jolly apposite, too as I think you'll agree).  As prize, he has nominated that we give publicity for this good deed - which we hasten to do.  Support Martin House Hospice and Alastair Green's run ! 

Friday, 11 May 2012

Eurofudge part 999

The astounding, no, amazing news this morning is that under intense pressure the Greek socialists have put together what might prove a workable coalition - workable for a few months anyway.

Who would have believed that eurofudge would win yet again. instead of a nice resolution to the real issue, namely Greece's massive uncompetitiveness due to its over-valued currency, we get some more, delicious fudge.

However, as with all sweet goods, the initial rush and taste will be welcome but the side effects wear off quickly. For a start, Greece will ask for better terms on its debt repayments and other concessions - all these things cost other people, not Greeks, more money. Moreover, when the inevitable default arrives, this is more money that has been wasted.

Now of course, with a magic money printing machine this money was in many senses never real anyway. The reality of monetary economics is of course under huge attack from the efforts of central banks playing with fire by printing money whilst hoping trust in paper currency does not collapse.

I don't think we are anywhere near that point yet; indeed, whilst the bailouts and eurofudge continue, the chimera can continue. The turning point will be the first default when the ECB should go technically bust, but somehow miraculously won't.

What will people think then of the digits they have in their bank accounts? Scary as the prospect is I am intrigued to see what the reaction is when people start actually questioning what money is and what has value. That way of course lies hyperinflation - policies today are determined to keep us in a Japan style financial repression for the foreseeable future to prevent this scenario from occurring.

Let's see what the next week brings....

Question Time Winner is .....

Winner of the first half of the 2012 Question Time competition is
 Measured
A fantastic result that humiliated Dick the Prick 
{if you use Boris result. Otherwise , if you use Hollande, it was too close to call}

DP took second, BQ 3rd, Philipa climbed to 4th and Mayor Timbo614 to 5th.
Congrats to all who have taken part on this long, long compo.

Measured -97

Dick the Prick - 96
Bill Quango MP - 89
Philipa - 88
Timbo614 -86
Nick Drew - 85
Miss CD - 83
Miss S-J - 82
 
Budgie - 78
Malcolm Tucker - 77
Sebastian Weetabix - 72
Cityunslicker - 71
appointmetotheboard - 71


Hopper - 68
GSD - 64
Botogol - 59
Hovis - 53
Andrew - 50

Jan - 48

lilith - 25
Mark Wadsworth -25

Amy 10
Anonymous - 7

James Higham - 5
Kynon - 4
Blue Eyes - 2
John in Cheshire - 2
EK -1
Dearieme - 1
 
Well done all.
Next week its the Euro champonship QT compo. One vs one.
 A slightly different scoring system.
Don't get too excited. 

Thursday, 10 May 2012

This is the final of the league.
Looks like its between Measured and DP. {
All Questions score double!
{After this - it'll be the European-Question Time championships. New league. Need to get yourselves seeded.}

David Dimbleby chairs a debate on the big stories of the week from Oldham.

Measured -88
Dick the Prick - 87
Bill Quango MP - 81
Timbo614 -80

Nick Drew - 79
Philipa - 77
Miss CD - 74
Miss S-J - 73
Budgie - 72

Malcolm Tucker - 69
Cityunslicker
- 69
appointmetotheboard - 65
Sebastian Weetabix - 63

Botogol - 59
Hopper - 59
GSD - 52
Andrew - 50

Jan - 48
Hovis - 42


lilith - 25

Mark Wadsworth -18

Amy 10
Anonymous - 7

James Higham - 5
Kynon - 4
Blue Eyes - 2
John in Cheshire - 2
EK -1
Dearieme - 1

Energy: Pigs on the Wing, Straws in the Wind

Some interesting developments in the public Energy space in the past few days, starting with the 2 Chris's:

Chris Smith Says Yes To Fracking - and in his latest guise he is chairman of the Environment Agency.  Slowly but surely, shale gas is going mainstream.

Pity he had to spoil it all by saying that the gas should only be used in power plants fitted with Carbon Capture 'n Storage.  What about my gas cooker, eh Smith ?

Chris Huhne says some Moderately Sensible Things.  There's something I never thought I'd say.  Obviously, his comments are topped and tailed by silly greenite sloganeering, because naturally he is making a pitch for leadership of some green-oriented anti-Clegg faction in the LibDems.  But, ho-hum, at least he evidently knows the truth - this, for example: 

"We can hope, of course, that new resources will gradually substitute for old as prices rise. The most promising candidate is shale gas"

A Hilarious Rider to a Massive Wind-farm Approval.  There's no stopping these subsidy-farms, but at least someone has a sense of humour, appending the following condition to the approval: 

"Precautions will also be taken to protect potential coal deposits under the site". 

There's hedging your bets for you ...

ND

Wednesday, 9 May 2012

The Queen's Speech

Very confused today as I thought the Queen's speech was something to do with the Leveson enquiry. Turns out it isn't.

What is it then? Well it is an opportunity for Clegg and Cameron to delight us all with their ideas for lots of lovely new laws for the Country to come in the next year or so. Great, we all want more laws don't we, can;t have enough of them?

Being a Coalition the technical term for the proposed legislation is a "bugger's muddle."  A few attempts at trying to reform the economy, liberally hidden within a miasma of crazy Lib Dem wish fulfilment (Lord's reform), appealing to single interest pleading lobbies (Small donations bill, groceries bill) and the odd sensible reform around Children in Care.

Comprehensive it is, cohesive it is not. having said that some serious bills are there around reforming public sector pensions - controversial the BBC manages to get in there.  As if somehow sane money management is controversial (actually at the BBC maybe they have problems on this issue....). Finally having the Banking bill is a good thing though, the faster the banks are de-toxified the better for the economy.

More depressing are the energy and utility bills which again seemed to be aimed at making anything sensible more difficult whilst at the same time further promoting the hopeless (Nuclear Industry) and the failing (Green investment).

This latter piece is the most worrying, the Country faces an urgent energy crisis as my well informed co-blogger Nick Drew has been writing about for years - yet the Tories seem to be happy to cede ground to Lib Dem fantasies about the Green world, probably because Cameron himself buys into this thinking.

Two things are in the future which are going to bring down this Government or the next - Spain's Euro exit and Power cuts in the UK. As the days tick by, both these events move inexorably closer.

The New Philosophy: Makes One Feel Rather Old

Well.  I studied philosophy myself, and we had lots of fun: Wittgenstein, Frege, all the lads. There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach yer 'bout the raising of the wrist, etc etc.  And I well remember seminars with such female luminaries as Elizabeth Anscombe, Philippa Foot and Mary Warnock.

But no-one quite like Shay Welch.  

No, they didn't make 'em like that in my day.

ND

Tuesday, 8 May 2012

Un Joli Divertissement d'EDF

EDF, one imagines, is going to have its work cut out under le nouveau régime.  Firstly, it must dissuade President Hollande from pursuing his phase-out policy for nuclear generation.  Secondly, it will doubtless face a reversion to type whereby French governments of yore would 'solve' unemployment by ringing up EDF, France Telecom et al with instructions for them to hire an additional 24,000 people or so at a time.  Good luck with all that.

And then there will be the vexed issue of EDF investing in 4 or more nukes in the UK.  Let's not go here just yet - they are certainly in no hurry - but rather enjoy their latest UK advertising which as you may have noticed features, errr, well ... a small orange Richard.  Which is promoting "electricity from low carbon generation".  Presumably this has tested better in focus groups than mention of dodgy old nukes.
  
 But there you go - who can afford to fly in the face of public opinion ? Eh, M. Sarkozy ?

ND

Monday, 7 May 2012

The Socialists are right - end austerity in Europe and watch the collapse

(...and maybe start some in the UK - another post for this later in the week though).

The Sweeping victory for Flanby has culminated in him saying it was a decisive vote against austerity. ( I not what Boris won with the same level of votes, but apparently he scraped in - media translation is everything!).

I must say, I can't agree more. Austerity is the last thing the broken Eurozone needs. Countries with unemployment approaching 30% and GDP sinking year after year. There is no need for this to happen at all.

Clearly, these countries are bust and it is time they woke up to that fact. The whole population will have to hand over 50% of their wealth - but in return they will get an economic boom and the chance to get back to these levels of wealth within a decade or so.

This process, called devaluation, will also be helped by leaving the euro and starting afresh with a new currency. Greece, Spain, Portugal all need to do this - probably Ireland too.

The Victory of the left parties will as ever prove the beginning of the end. The People's of Europe did not believe the Right wing parties when they said it was necessary to make cuts - too much do people rely on the help of others for their lifestyles. Now, they have voted for fantasy they will infact bring forth reality.

Euro exit is going to be very painful and the markets are going to have a hissy fit. Banks are hoarding money so it looks like we may get a credit crunch and the devaluations. This could make 2008 look like a tea party. At least in the UK the process of devaluation that will be forced on us will be relatively painless - another 20% or so is needed if the Euro collapses.

Hard hats to come, FTSE will drop 2% tomorrow, maybe more with days of this to come.


And you thought this summer was going to be about the Jubliee, Euro's and the Olympics.

Saturday, 5 May 2012

Miliband cleans up.


Labour have swept the board. Ed Miliband deserves congratulations. It was a great success. 854 new councillors, quite widely spread across the UK. I never thought he had it in him!

We’ll let the papers tell you why windturbine Tories did so badly. Lets have a quick look at why Ed’s Labour did so well.

Firstly, the low turnout was a massive boost to an opposition party. In some areas the vote was so small it was basically a fight amongst activists. Its much easier to get worked up against the government than for it. All incumbent parties suffer this. Especially midterms. Obama was given a similar sized boot in his. It doesn't diminish the success. But it did make it easier.

Secondly, this is a result fought over a pre-coalition background. When Labour last contested these seats they had to fight the protest party of the Lib Dems as well as the Tories. Then the liberals were the anti-Browns. Now the Liberals ARE the Tories. Labour is fighting on only one front. The message is its US vs THEM.

Thirdly. The total incompetence of the government in the last six weeks. Not one decent headline. Its almost as if the pre Mandelson Brown cabal had wandered back into office. A budget disaster. Pasty stories. Murdoch. Hunt. Fuel crisis. Qatada. Posh boys...
Any government can have bad luck, but to make their own bad luck is unforgivable. Why did the Tories tax 100% rock solid blue pensioners just before an election? Why did they do the half hearted tax cut to 45%? It cost them the positives of the taxation threshold rise without the gain of bold headlines for tax cutting.. It wasn’t necessary to do it now. Why not next year?
Miliband had the misfortune of the Ken tax story but that’s a local London matter, and it cost him his hat trick. But as the Tories have cocked up, labour have cocked up less. Miliband managed to avoid to much flak from the Galloway shock.  The misjudgement of Tom Watson to plug his book, hasn’t had much impact on anyone. Opposition don’t have to say much. If anything. Tony Blair won a landslide without having any policies at all. Ed Miliband took that lesson on board from his first day.

Fourthly – The media. This was just fortunate for Miliband but he didn’t upset the right wing press, which allowed him to exploit it. Since the budget the Tories dropped about 8% in the polls. That was a real drop where voters giving the benefit of the doubt decided they’d had enough. A daily negative press about Cameron, Tories, government, Liberals  and cock ups reinforced the rich vs poor, they are incompetent narrative.. Front pages with queues of foreigners stuck in an airports wouldn't normally upset the Daily Mail too much. But they went berserk. Weeks of damning headlines.
If this were a real election the right wing press would have been much more partisan. 

That doesn’t mean that Prime Minister Miliband is something we will be hearing in 3 years time.
Mid terms don’t mean much. The Liberals have now taken their final hit across all those angry voters who felt cheated by the coalition agreement. They won’t sink much lower. They are now at core. Elections are an uphill climb and each new seat that labour needs to take from the Liberals and Tories is steeper than the last.
The good UKIP councilor gains don’t net them any MPs. In a real election, when not voting blue probably does mean a vote for the red, voters will be less likely to give UKIP their preference. Especially if Cameron finally acknowledges the Euro split within his party and does something about it.

There are still three years to go. A lot can happen. The economy might come good. The SNP might struggle..or do better. The Liberals might find a reason to get people to vote for them again. Europe’s instability might have blown up or calmed down. So the result isn’t that important in the long term.

But for Ed Miliband it is still a very, very good result, And one that he can use to show that he can generate support and can get people out to vote for him. The coalition have allowed Labour back into the game. And so made the 2015 election much, much closer.

Boris wins - what took so long?

Still waiting for the London election results.
This is going on forever.
Finally at midnight SKY call it for Boris with 51%-49% which is far narrower than expected. 
The big news, that wasn't even on the poll quiz, was the hopeless Jenny Jones of the Green party is in 3rd place with 4.5%. Ahead of Brian Paddick, who seemed much more credible than last time. Boris gave a good victory speech. Ken's was very sour. Tired and bitter. I'm glad he lost.

We'll have an Opinion piece later. But now the all important compo.


Results
1 - Boris 51.5% - 48.5%% win. 3%+ {why did that take so long?}
2 - UKIP got ?{don't know on seats but votes for mayor below 2% - very poor.}   . Siobhan Benita did well with 3.8%.
3 - Labour did fantastically. 854 gain. Well beyond their top end expectations
4 - 9 cities voted against a mayor . One for and one ,Doncaster,  comfortably against expectations, keep their mayor.{62%-38%} 
5 - Glasgow. SNP had very limited gains and Labour remain comfortably in control.
6 - Liberals had a nightmare and lost over 50%. - 71 remain.

Hopper - 4
Hovis- 2
Measured - 5
Gsd - 1 {ouch!}
Bill Quango MP - 4
Sebastian Weetabix - 6
  Nick Drew - 3
Lilith - 2
Appointmetotheboard - 3
Andrew - 2
Dick the Prick - 5
Miss CD - 7
Timbo614 - 8
Budgie - 4
Jan - 1 {ohhh!}
Mark Wadsworth - 2 {we read all your posts to.}
Malcolm Tucker - 5
Cityunslicker - 7
Philipa - 6

As the returning officer I now pronounce that Timbo614 is the mayor of London.

Friday, 4 May 2012

... And How Will The Irish Vote?

While we await the outcome of Mr Q's poll of polls, let's consider another imminent democratic dénouement: the benighted Irish are having a referendum on the European 'treaty' on 31st May.

Some like to think that they will confound Brussels, though this time Guido is a bit tentative.  Of course, the Irish have form on this: come up with the wrong answer and they are simply sent back to vote again until they get it right. Being put under all manner of pressure, with the main parties pressing hard for a 'yes' and making lurid threats.  Noonan the Barbarian, in particular, has offered vast tax increases and job losses if they don't do as they are told.

I've noted before that the Irish seem rather crushed at the moment, and this sort of thing looks like a pretty clear straw in the wind. So you'd have to guess it'll be 'yes'.

Of course the obvious retort is - so what ?  No-one knows in detail what's being voted on: the French & Germans will re-write the Treaty as they see fit, as often as they see fit.  We shall return to this sorry story when we know Sarkozy's fate - and doubtless many more times besides.

ND


photo (c) Nick Drew 2012

Thursday, 3 May 2012

Question Time - They all 'did better than predicted' special.


Question Time
Election special.

These election ones are really difficult. So instead of the usual QT tonight its a voting special à la Political betting.

6 Qs. 2 point for each correct answer

1. Who will be London mayor & by what %
2. Will UKIP replace the Greens in the London assembly? What will Benita's % vote be.
3. Will Labour gain 600+ or 700+ Councillors?
4. Of the 11 English cities deciding on having a mayor, how many will say yes.
5. Will the SNP end up running Glasgow council?
6. The Lib dems have 166 councilors in Scotland . All are up for election. How many will they have after the polls close {to within 10}

Wednesday, 2 May 2012

Tax-Dodging Civil Servants: Nothing New Under The Sun

I really find this hard to credit. "2,000 senior public officials on more than £58,200 were found to be paid “off payroll” ... paid through service companies, or through employment agencies. The amount of tax legally avoided could run into tens of millions of pounds."  Danny Alexander is shocked !

History Corner here: we've done all this nearly 20 years ago, when John 'Dalek' Birt was revealed by the Inde to have wangled his way around the BBC whilst wreaking havoc and lowering standards. 

"John Birt, the new Director-General of the BBC, has avoided tax by being paid as a freelance consultant - despite being a full-time employee of the Corporation. Instead of paying tax on his BBC salary, he has been taxed on whatever he chooses to pay himself from his private company ... for six years as Deputy Director-General he was paid through his private company." 

That was written in ... 1993! And my clear understanding was that Birt being rumbled in this way marked the beginning of the end for this little scam, both as regards what the public sector would allow, and indeed what the Revenue would permit. 

It seems I woz wrong. 

ND

T5 Heathrow queues are bitter sweet

Whilst passing through the airport I alighted on a sight that made me reconsider the disaster that it the full passport check imposed on non EU nationals.

Plenty of EU nationals were with me and we all whizzed through, whilst a massive queue was building on the non-EU side.

Most of this consisted on Amercian businessman as it was redeye arrival time. Wow, were they pissed, to use the American parlance.

Waving their precious Blue passports and demanding special treatment.

'Well' I thought, 'Now you know.'

Having travelled and lived in the US, passport control there is a nightmare, in the 1990's I was travelling often on my own on a Irish passport, that meant instantly being taken aside at any airport and sent to sit with the Mexicans and others for between three and six hours. Harshly questioned and then sent on my way. In the same vein the US Government demands data from our airlines about passengers casually states it will keep all this information for at least 15 years.

In fact many non-Eu countries make it a tight pain to travel to them in my experience, so perhaps our Heathrow revenge should be lauded rather than whined about?

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

Austerity ? A Long Way To Go

So which is the only nation of the European 28 (EU 27 + Norway) where labour costs have fallen since 2009 ?

It's Ireland.

Where, incidentally, average labour costs are still higher than those of the UK, Italy and Spain - see the Eurostat data here.

Growth without competitiveness ? Good luck with that. Hard to avoid the conclusion that reality is going to be very painful all round.

ND

Monday, 30 April 2012

Is hating the rich so much new or a reaction to recession?

Everything I read or see at the moment has people going on about hating rich people, even churchmen who should know better. In a capitalist economy this is to be expected to some extent as different outcomes are a feature of the system, but certainly things have accelerated in the past few years in the UK.

A few drivers I can see are:

1) Huge increase in state spending has left much of the populace dependent on state handouts, with recession and the huge debt run up, these must fall and to counter this the cry goes up of soak the rich to prevent this.

2) During a difficult recession many people are struggling and unsurprisingly become more envious of those who have more - also as jobs are more scarce the chances of someone improving their own fortunes becomes smaller, perhaps making them more bitter about those who have.

3) The opposition Labour party in the UK have no alternative political offer to the governing Coalition. As such they are the ultimate political opportunists. With no policy differentiation, they are instead going for ad hominem attacks and have stuck on calling the Government 'posh boys.' Ever since Tony Blair left office the Left Wing of the Labour Party has increased its class based rhetoric.

4) There is also a confusion bourne of immigration. The new Sunday Times rich list clearly shows that most of the very rich are foreigners who have come to live in London - not British people made good on the backs of the workers. It is a different form of immigration compared to that which has held down unskilled wages, but an impact of the choice made by the last Government to encourage rapid population change in the UK.

I think all of the above are the key factors - have I missed any? One is a macro state issue, the second a result of economic changes, the third political and the fourth a combination of political/government regulations. I can't really tell which is the dominant one, although 1) and 3) seem to drive the behaviour in the media.

It is worrying though, the constant whine about people who succeed will either make people not want to do it, or drive those who do to live elsewhere. The usual retort is that people don't leave and this is bluster, but one look at the migration statistics shows that 143,000 British citizens emigrated in 2011, a 12% increase on 2010 - the trend is up from a collapse in emigration during the financial crash. With only 1% of taxpayers contributing 25% of income tax, this is the equivalent to 260,000 people - so not many have to leave to make a real dent in the Government's income.

Where I am seeking more information is how different things feel now to say the 1980's or 1970's - I was only a child then and have no real feel for how much the rhetoric was for hating the rich. Certainly it feels to me as if things are headed back this way, but will this fad pass with the recession?


Saturday, 28 April 2012

Fighting Energy-Talk: Don't Mention The War ...

When German energy companies plot the map showing where their gas comes from, it must give them a frisson of atavistic horror. The great red arrows still arc from East to West with their origins in Russia.  The shades of Zhukov and Koniev are abroad.  

Decades of German foreign policy have been given over to appeasing Gazprom: they know what staves off hypothermia on those cold nights in Prussia and Bavaria.  So it comes to something when a senior executive at RWE can publicly state:

"Every producer but one has understood that structural change is required. If the one that hasn’t understood it so far doesn’t accept the facts, he will have to learn it the hard way. Nobody’s bigger than the market, not even the biggest supplier."   (Stefan Judisch, CEO RWE Trading, 'Flame' 17 April)

What's meant by this is that our old friends at 'the one that hasn't understood' (Gazprom, this means you) must stop insisting on oil-price indexation for their gas, and concede a lot more than the 15 or 20% spot-gas indexation they have yielded thus far in tortuous price re-negotiations.  

Implicitly, it is also clear from Judisch's outburst that RWE is so far up the creek, diplomatic niceties no longer matter. They are not alone: the other giants of Russian gas importing - E.on, GdF-Suez and ENI - are also slowly bleeding white from the effects of their huge, long-term, horribly out-of-the-money oil-indexed gas contracts, and other energy-sector issues of an intractable nature.

Why anyone at DECC ever imagined these guys will chip in for four or five UK nukes is beyond me. 

ND